LA's Reviews > The Alienist

The Alienist by Caleb Carr
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
7862560
's review

it was ok
Read 3 times. Last read 2018.

To paraphrase Jules from Pulp Fiction, "Say Marches Carcano chair one more time...." BAM!

Sorry. My tolerance for the repeated naming of the characters' fabulous Italian chairs, bought at auction, was shot by the fifth time the overinflated verbiage was used. I don't know, maybe the writer - a history buff - made this furniture up based on a famous murder weapon. A Carcano was what was used to kill JFK, if you didn't know. Anyway, I was ready to fire a gun into these ridiculous chairs myself.

EDIT: in trying to give the book its due, I read that the author has gone back to writing non-fiction, military history books. That seemed like a better fit, and I just now clicked on his author profile to see if there were something my son, a military history buff, might like. HA! The first thing I saw was that Caleb Carr read and reviewed The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Fair That Changed America - he gave it TWO STARS! Oh the irony.

Let me back up. I first read The Alienist 20 some years ago. Upon joining GoodReads, like you, I went through some lists of books and gauged my old reads based on memory. It was one of those psychological thrillers popular in the late 80s and early 90s. Patricia Cornwell's forensic murder investigations, the FBI profilers who sought out Buffalo Bill via Hannibal Lecter, those true crime books from Ann Rule, and the cult-fave "why-dun-it" The Secret History by Donna Tart were en vogue with publishers and readers alike. Here, we do have some nice tie-ins to real events and personas from late 1800s NYC. Im guessing New Yorkers will have gotten a kick out of this backdrop - this is like CSI NYC: Century 19.

I gave The Alienist three stars then and now a two, re-reading it as a commitment for book club. The story is a Sherlock Holmes-Dr. Watson trope with a token emancipated female, a black sidekick, compassion for the gay community, and a couple of unappreciated-by-the-police-force-but-brilliant Jewish detectives. One of the victims is a kid with middle Eastern heritage, too - the author ticked every box he could including Irish cops on the dole and clergy being paid off by the uber wealthy. He even tossed in some animal cruelty. Lastly, the analysis of abnormal human psychology was about as deep as a write up in Cosmo magazine.

Now, if you have never read any true-crime books or novels where profiling is described, then you may actually enjoy this story. But let me better suggest His Bloody Project: Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae for something also set in the 1800s and about a thousand times better than this!

I do confess to having a crush on Teddy Roosevelt and initially was delighted to see his role crop up throughout the book - I had forgotten he was in the story. Unfortunately, the author rather wrote Roosevelt like a caricature of himself, even feeling compelled to insert the appearance of Roosevelt's overly boisterous children, one after another. Yes, I know he was a terrific father and loved his children to be active, but this little section was over the top. We had to hear the exclamation BULLY! way too often.

Little stuff that bugged me? There were sections in The Alienist where the characters turned their noses up at hardworking farmers or less affluent passengers on a train, and yet while at the opera, their dialogue slammed New York's upper crust for not wanting to associate with a mere crime reporter and an alienist/psychologist. Aside from the constant mention of the aforementioned Marchese Carcano chairs, their giddiness over opera, the description of multiple six course meals at Delmonico's, and the need to change into dinner clothes gave the entire book a snotty, metro-sexual feel. I'm generally okay with unlikeable protagonists and often get attached to even the most unsavory anti-hero. Here, they were just written too snarky for me to care about.

Save yourself the time and effort, and just watch the January 22nd debut of The Alienist on TNT. The costumes and late 1800s backgrounds guarantee to be lush, and I'll bet the screenwriters do a good job with the rewrite.

And for God's sake, keep a look out for those ridiculous Italian chairs.

EDIT. The TNT series includes a subplot with the journalist who is now instead an illustrator (so we can see the reactions of those who view his sketches of the murdered?) tying to some secret marriage fantasy. The chairs haven't appeared just yet! Ha.
66 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Alienist.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading (Paperback Edition)
February 21, 2012 – Shelved (Paperback Edition)
Started Reading
2018 – Finished Reading
January 3, 2018 – Shelved as: reading-sanctuar... (Paperback Edition)
January 13, 2018 – Started Reading (Paperback Edition)
January 20, 2018 – Shelved
January 20, 2018 – Finished Reading (Paperback Edition)

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Debbie (new) - added it

Debbie Beauteous review! Now what we need here are Italian dentist chairs! I have no interest in reading an uber-snotty book that features chairs and opera. I’ll skip and head for the tube!


Zoeytron "... about as deep as a write up in Cosmo magazine." Fabulous!


message 3: by LA (new) - rated it 2 stars

LA Debbie, you crack me up! Those expensive chairs and opera at the Met could’ve been a nice touch, even one dinner at Del’s too. But like using, say, a rain-soaked season to give a novel a dreary overall feel, the author was overly pointed in bringing these posh things out repeatedly. By way of contrast, the tenements they visited were identically described - keyslot windows, feces in the halls. Just - cartoonish.

Im not a TV watcher but will def watch before book club!


message 4: by LA (new) - rated it 2 stars

LA Zoey, yep! Harsh, unforgiving potty training will do bad things to the psyche, dontcha know ;)


message 5: by Jaidee (new)

Jaidee I read this when I was 26 or so and I adored it...I would have rated it five stars really back then...I wonder where I would sit with it now !!

Interesting review LeAnne !!


message 6: by LA (new) - rated it 2 stars

LA Jaidee wrote: "I read this when I was 26 or so and I adored it...I would have rated it five stars really back then...I wonder where I would sit with it now !!

Interesting review LeAnne !!"


You're on to something crucial here, I think. When I was in the process of reading this (I was 33) the first time, it was during that new surge of forensic fiction. It probably was a 4. When I joined Goodreads maybe five years ago, looking back, it was a 3. As I've been lucky enough to find really excellent literary fiction these past few years - entirely because of GR friends and groups - my palate is different. The hurdles are higher.

Do you think your then/now ratings are different?


message 7: by Jaidee (new)

Jaidee LeAnne wrote: "Jaidee wrote: "I read this when I was 26 or so and I adored it...I would have rated it five stars really back then...I wonder where I would sit with it now !!

Interesting review LeAnne !!"

You're..."


I'm not sure as I read so few books more than once !


Renae Your review had me in stitches!!

I agree the author spent way too much time on trivial dialogue and pointless mentionings; as well as going out of his way to check off every minority box he possibly could.

I enjoyed reading your review more than the book


message 9: by LA (new) - rated it 2 stars

LA Renae wrote: "Your review had me in stitches!!

I agree the author spent way too much time on trivial dialogue and pointless mentionings; as well as going out of his way to check off every minority box he possi..."


Renae, you know I love finding another kindred spirit in disliking a book! I've watched maybe two or three episodes of the series, so its too soon to tell, but they seem better than the book so far.


back to top