Sketchbook's Reviews > Angels in America

Angels in America by Tony Kushner
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4708498
's review

did not like it

Kushner's overheated - and vastly overrated - opus sent me scurrying for my Yma Sumac CD, "The Voice of the Xtaby." When I want a guest to leave my apartment, I put it on with the admonition, "You must hear her 5-octave pipes!" and, shortly, I am happily alone. You too can hear Yma on YT. She trills from high soprano to basso. The music suggests tweeting birds or a volcanic eruption. Kushner, I read, thought his play might be a musical, initially, and it would have needed Yma. It still does.

Its success is a prime example of how a few mediocre dramer critics, infected w toxic fairy dust or nerve gas, can stampede the public into casting off sane reflection and start belching cheerless huzzahs. Kushner's "monumental achievement" mixes gays and Jews and Mormons (huhh?) in a series of blackout sketches, performed by usually two characters (I dont think he can write for 3 actors onstage). The AIDS crise turned him into a Writer, as it did others, so attention must be paid, as Arthur Miller rumbled. Since Kushner has nothing to say, he deals solely with emotions: mostly agitation and anger. A young man dying of AIDS is abandoned by his lover who becomes involved with a closeted gay Mormon who, in turn, has a shrill, pill-addicted wife. The monstrous lawyer Roy Cohn, also dying, gets a ghostly visit from the pathetic Ethel Rosenberg; amid the hysteria, and juvenile raillery, an angel descends and --- where's Yma Sumac?

Like Brecht, Kushner does not write "characters." He writes "symbols" : Evil, Affectation, Death, The Oppressed. His jabber goes on endlessly. "Our suffering teaches us solidarity; or it should," he allows. "Because Kushner has written a second-rate play...about being gay, and about AIDS, no one is going to call [it] the overwrought, coarse, posturing, formulaic mess that it is," explains a writer in the New Republic. Meantime, essayist Andrew Sullivan, who loathed the play, dismissed it as political agitprop, adding: "Gay life - and gay death - surely awaits something grander and subtler than this."

I saw an early preview c 1991, and the ranting and raging onstage put me to sleep, though I awoke when Roy Cohn (Evil) was dying in pain, which made members of the audience feel Good. I tried to see the Mike Nichols movie, and again I got the snores, especially when Meryl Streep appeared as a rabbi (or was that a bad dream?) It took me a few days to finish a play read, w long naps. The frenzy and yelping agony of passion in Kushner's revue sent me to Yma Sumac, the Peruvian songbird. Skip this theatrical salacacabia and give yourself up to Yma.
25 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Angels in America.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 7, 2018 – Started Reading
March 7, 2018 – Shelved
March 9, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jon (last edited Mar 09, 2018 11:08AM) (new)

Jon Zelazny Or is it simply that it conforms less to the strictures of character-based play writing and more to the panoramic social novel, or a Robert Altman movie? I only saw the HBO version, back whenever it came out, but certainly found it compelling and moving. Maybe Kushner felt he had to go broad and cosmic to trick straight audiences into seeing a gay / AIDS saga.

I've also used Yma Sumac to shoo away guests who have outstayed their welcome. WHITE LIGHT/WHITE HEAT always works too.


message 2: by Sketchbook (last edited Mar 09, 2018 03:05PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sketchbook Altman was a "great" director, of course. (Nichols was not)...I like the panoramic social novel...I've read that Kushner had an unhappy home life; his father, thinking he might be gay, sent him to shrinks at age 16...his play suggests family life was a constant argumentative-lamentation... to my mind angels and ghosts are not cosmic, they're mere devices. You are right, though, he found audiences...the soon-to-open revival will get swell reviews, as the promo drums are banging loudly.


message 3: by Jesse (new)

Jesse I too, can't manage to muster up much enthusiasm for it, though I do respect it bc it has meant so much to a number of people, and especially so at time when something meaningful was needed. I do wonder how it will play as we move further and further from the great shadow of the Plague, and figures like Cohn aren't really figures in the public consciousness and so don't function as well as symbols.


message 4: by Sketchbook (last edited Mar 09, 2018 04:34PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sketchbook I agree with and understand what you are saying, Jesse. Prop names like Roy Cohn and Ethel Rosenberg will soon be eh-wot? curios. Odets-Maxwell Anderson-Robt Sherwood, playwrights of reputation in 30s-40s, are storehoused today. ~~ I realize "Angels" meant much to some people in the 90s, but it has been called monumental, etc..! Puleeeze--. The only thing I find interesting is that villain (Cohn) and semi-villain (Louis) are both despicable loud-mouths. Hysterics. Their box office appeal is a weird "inversion." ~ (This is why I don't get on with groups or herds or political parties : they smother individuality.)


message 5: by Sketchbook (last edited Mar 11, 2018 09:34AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sketchbook I do like the word : salacacabia. My next password.


message 6: by Sketchbook (last edited Mar 12, 2018 07:25AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sketchbook Yes, it's vaudeville as mellerdrama. ~~ I think in the 80s-90s most ppl knew at least one person terminated by AIDS. Some, like myself, even more. This piece gave no consolation. Too much jabber and too many theatricks. One can say Kushner's heart is in the right place -- one cliche deserves another.


message 7: by Sketchbook (last edited Mar 13, 2018 04:58AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sketchbook Amid the Kushner rants, he doesn't question how the plague got started--. (Was it a govt - produced plague?)


message 8: by David (new)

David Gustafson Sketch, stop messing around with their big, big heroes or else the PC police are going to hunt like a three-legged dog and shame you for the rest of your earthly existence.


Sketchbook This is true. (I do like to provoke...)


message 10: by David (last edited Mar 12, 2018 09:25AM) (new)

David Gustafson And the PC spank wankers will not stand for any provocation that challenges their curdled narrative.


back to top