Steve's Reviews > The Complete Maus

The Complete Maus by Art Spiegelman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
236411
's review

it was amazing

It didn’t dawn on me until later that this brilliant piece of graphic artistry and fiction is actually a very clever allegory. On the face of it, we’re led to believe that it’s a story of the terrible suffering perpetrated by the Nazis against the Jews in Poland and throughout Europe. But if you scratch beneath the surface, I think you’ll find that this particular holocaust story was made to symbolize something more pervasive and endemic. I speak of the horrific violence that persists to this day; that inflicted by cats on defenseless mice. Perhaps the most obvious clue that this is, in truth, the intended theme lies in the title itself: Maus. For those of you unfamiliar with German, this is their word for mouse. Beyond that, when you look carefully at the drawings, you see that the goose-steppers have distinctly feline features, while the persecuted Jews in the ghettos and camps have rodent-like proboscides and disproportionately small eyes.

Cat on mouse violence is so old and pervasive that, in a way, we’ve become desensitized to it. Countless depictions of it in the arts have made it a stale, clichéd topic; almost cartoonish at times. That’s why I thought it was particularly effective to tell the story allegorically. When seen through the lens of the Jewish experience, and with Spiegelman’s masterstroke of personalizing the story by laying bare the difficult relationship he had with his father (the survivor), the residuum of cat brutality that can literally tear mice families apart is brought home to us in a very different way.

Original: Mar 9, 2012

------------------------

Addendum: Aug 23, 2013

This still ranks as my top graphic novel of all time, but I just finished Chris Ware's Building Stories which gives it a pretty good run for the money. The suffering in that one may not be as extreme, but it's every bit as real.
148 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Complete Maus.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
March 9, 2012 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-50 of 62 (62 new)


Steve I hope I haven’t been insensitive to the real human suffering that Spiegelman did such a wonderful job of conveying.


message 2: by s.penkevich (new)

s.penkevich Ha irony. This is great. I need to pick this up while they are still selling those ace hardcovers in honor of its anniversary. And kick the cat for trying to be a nazi.


Stephen M Awesome review. Quite po-pomo.


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio Great book. Great review.

Have you read his 9/11 one?


Steve Thanks, fellas.

I hadn't heard about In the Shadow of No Towers, but from the description it sounds good. Joshua, I see it got 4 stars from you.


message 6: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye This cat on mouse violence can only occur in a world in which there is no Dog.


Steve Good point, Ian. The existence of Dog, even in His most abstract form, changes everything.


message 8: by Jason (new)

Jason What kind of run for its money did it give it?




Steve Well, Jason, it was a more successful run than poor Jerry had. This is a perfect example to illustrate my point!


message 10: by Sue (last edited Aug 25, 2013 05:45AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue This was the first graphic novel I read also. Funny how I missed that so-obvious allegory. I guess I just am always looking for subtleties!

The 2nd one I read was Fun Home: a Family Tragicomic. and I really want to read Persepolis.


Steve Sue wrote: "This was the first graphic novel I read also. Funny how I missed that so-obvious allegory. I guess I just am always looking for subtleties!"

To be honest, I was surprised to be one of the few to pick up on this. Maybe, as you say, the tendency among clever goodreaders is to look for the less obvious.

I've been curious about the Bechdel book. She's very literary, I hear, for that kind of art form. I saw Persepolis as a movie and thought it was well done. Hope it's even better on the page.


message 12: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Maybe it's all that trolling through prior centuries, especially the 19th, where nothing really is as it seems. All that flitting between floors.


message 13: by Garima (new)

Garima I have never read a graphic novel. Imagine all the awesomeness waiting for me. (view spoiler) Great review as always, Steve.


message 14: by Luke (new) - rated it 4 stars

Luke Garima wrote: "I have never read a graphic novel. Imagine all the awesomeness waiting for me. [spoilers removed] Great review as always, Steve."

It's alright, Garima. You could be like me, having devoted an obscene amount of my lifespan to graphic novels and the like. Better a yet to be had first experience than a history of unhealthy obsession.


Steve @Sue -- Sounds like that prior reading experience conditioned you. Tell me, do you salivate like a Pavlovian data point whenever you encounter obscure symbols or cryptic allegories?

@Garima -- Not that I'm a connoisseur, but I do know there is a lot of awesomeness there to be had. This would be a good intro to the form, I think. (view spoiler)

@Aubrey -- Your obsession has had no ill effects that I can see. If anything, your literary attainments seem decidedly superior to those of your peers who feasted on printed words only.


message 16: by Luke (new) - rated it 4 stars

Luke Steve wrote: "@Aubrey..."

Heh. I was very fortunate in it resulting like that, I assure you.


message 17: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Steve wrote: "@Sue -- Sounds like that prior reading experience conditioned you. Tell me, do you salivate like a Pavlovian data point whenever you encounter obscure symbols or cryptic allegories?

@Garima -- No..."


Ah, my weak spot!


message 18: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily The reason I like this review is that it satirises what troubles me about the book (which I confess I haven't read). Because cats are natural predators of mice, the analogy with the Holocaust seems dangerously wrong. This review makes the same point in a far better way. (At least, I think it does!)


Steve Cecily wrote: "The reason I like this review is that it satirises what troubles me about the book (which I confess I haven't read). Because cats are natural predators of mice, the analogy with the Holocaust seems..."

That's an interesting point I hadn't really considered, Cecily. The analogy doesn't really work when we consider cats and mice as part of nature's food chain. The morality of cat behavior is questioned only in a knowingly silly or wrong, anthropomorphized way. Not so with Nazis and Jews. I suppose we could argue, pessimistically, that the atrocities are part of the nature of man, but I think most of us still reserve the right to feel moral outrage.


message 20: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily Aha, so you weren't making the point I thought you were! Never mind; we've each given the other something to think about.


Steve I'm often given credit for insights I never had. :-) Your point was well-taken, though. Thanks for making it!

I'd say that Maus is worth picking up even if the analogy is less than perfect. There are plenty of other reasons to appreciate it.


message 22: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily Steve wrote: "...I'd say that Maus is worth picking up even if the analogy is less than perfect. There are plenty of other reasons to appreciate it."

So I've heard, but graphic novels are not really my thing anyway, so I doubt I will. Thanks for an interesting review, though.


message 23: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Cecily, I'm not sure whether I've understood your perspective. My concern is that, if we fail to draw analogies with other, "lesser" conflicts, we might not see the next Holocaust coming. If we think of the Holocaust as qualitatively unique, we might become complacent. I think there are analogies at the level of playground bullying (especially when it leads to murder or suicide).


message 24: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily Ian, it's more likely that I've misunderstood the book, which I know by jacket-blurb and review, rather than actually reading it: I know the starting concept, but not the detail. What you say makes sense, and reassures me somewhat that the analogy might be better than it first seems.


message 25: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Cecily, you might want to give this one a try even if you read no other graphic novels. It really is a worthwhile reading experience on many levels.


message 26: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily Sue wrote: "Cecily, you might want to give this one a try even if you read no other graphic novels. It really is a worthwhile reading experience on many levels."

I'm beginning to get that feeling. Thanks.


message 27: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Cecily wrote: "Sue wrote: "Cecily, you might want to give this one a try even if you read no other graphic novels. It really is a worthwhile reading experience on many levels."

I'm beginning to get that feeling...."


Let me know if you do. I'd really love to know what you think.


message 28: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark This is a fine slice of writing, Steve! Can't wait to read your review for Ware!


Steve Why thank you, kind sir! I'm trying to reclaim some time for more reviewing and Goodreading in general.


message 30: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark Ha! That seems to be a tall order for a lot of us, lately :D

This is a fantastic review. I'm so glad you added the addendum so I could read er early. Whenever I figure out how to reclaim time, there are bunches of your reviews I have yet to read.

Ole Proust is rappin about reclaiming past-time, but I need a way to reserve future time, dangit!


Steve Ah, the perfect tie-in: In Search of Lost Time. Hope we all can find more of that precious future kind, Mark. BTW, are you planning to read the whole of Proust's work?


message 32: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Ironically, Proust had to recall/reclaim time subsequently, partly because he didn't use it properly at the time, when he had it.


Steve Is it safe to say he did a pretty good job of it in the end, Ian? As prolific as he was, I'm guessing he balanced his work with his bon vivant lifestyle rather well. Then again, if it was one of those feast or famine deals, maybe he didn't.


message 34: by Ian (last edited Aug 29, 2013 09:39PM) (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye He had a lot to catch up on. It was a bit like Tristram Shandy though. If you haven't read that, the narrator started off writing a book about bringing up his child, then found that he was writing so much, he didn't have any time to spend on his son, so somebody else had to bring him up. He continued to write though! The writing can detract from the living of life (which is supposed to form the subject matter of our writing). The thing is that Proust is remembered for his writing, not the living of his life. Writing is a quest for eternity. On the other hand, Oscar Wilde reckons he put his genius into his life, as opposed to his writing, though I think he was being a bit harsh on himself. Personally, I feel a bit guilty that, when I write, I do so with my back turned on my family. So I've moved my desk 90%!


message 35: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir s.penkevich wrote: "Ha irony. This is great. I need to pick this up while they are still selling those ace hardcovers in honor of its anniversary. And kick the cat for trying to be a nazi."

Cats would never be Nazis. Order? Discipline? Obedience? Marching in ranks? Wearing costumes? Your cat is laughing at your gullibility, and also considering peeing on your boot.


Steve You present the paradox well with those examples, Ian. It's a reminder of how hard the optimization can be. With the living of life, writing of life, and all other meaningful pursuits in life competing for our time, it's a wonder we ever feel equilibrated. It's when time is at its scarcest that we have to remember to laugh (or reposition our desks). :-)

Hope the new configuration is working well for you!


message 37: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Steve wrote: "Hope the new configuration is working well for you!"

It's working well for me. The others I'm not so sure about. I do move when our TV interests coincide occasionally. I even watched Australia's Next Top Model last night! And taking sides.


message 38: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Miriam wrote: "Cats would never be Nazis. Order? Discipline? Obedience? Marching in ranks? Wearing costumes? Your cat is laughing at your gullibility, and also considering peeing on your boot."

Like Hitler, perhaps, cats probably can't believe how easily manipulated humans are.


Steve Miriam wrote: "Cats would never be Nazis. Order? Discipline? Obedience? Marching in ranks? Wearing costumes? Your cat is laughing at your gullibility, and also considering peeing on your boot."

Oh God, you're so right, Miriam! Trying to visualize the "marching in ranks" part made me realize the absurdity of the whole proposition (and made me laugh more than any lolcat ever has).


message 40: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Oh I want like buttons here. Thanks Miriam. The visual of cats marching in ranks is just....inexpressible!


message 41: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Ian wrote: "Like Hitler, perhaps, cats probably can't believe how easily manipulated humans are. "

Cats could be dictators but never lackeys.

Also, war often involves that whole "short rations" thing that I don't visualize being a hit with felines.


message 42: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark Steve wrote: "Ah, the perfect tie-in: In Search of Lost Time. Hope we all can find more of that precious future kind, Mark. BTW, are you planning to read the whole of Proust's work?"

Fingers crossed! :) Maybe we all need to just become comatose, retreat inside our own minds and communicate via telepathy??

I'm on the fence about reading the entire series, at the moment. There are moments where a scene shines brilliantly and will hold my interest for two or three pages. Afterward comes a ten page stretch where I nearly fall asleep. To be fair, Proust's writing style is not my favorite. I see why other people would enjoy it, it's just not for me.


message 43: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark Miriam wrote: "Ian wrote: "Like Hitler, perhaps, cats probably can't believe how easily manipulated humans are. "

Cats could be dictators but never lackeys."


It would be a short reign of terror, at least. I've never known a cat to pay prolonged attention to anything!


Steve I could see why you'd equivocate on Proust, Mark, if his writing isn't to your taste.

I'm not sure that a cat's patience and attention means that it's ready for Proust -- I think it means it's ready to pounce on anything unsuspecting. :-)


message 45: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark I have the same reaction to Faulkner's work. He can write a mean sentence...that goes on for pages and pages and pages, but I'm more interested in his subject matter than his pyrotechnics. He and Faulkner remind me of each other, actually. Different subject matter, but similar styles.

The strange thing about him, when I reach one of those nice cozy moments, the mental picture involves a warm fire, pajamas, and a kitty curled upon my lap :D Can't dislike a writer capable of conjuring that image :)


Steve The closer it gets to dinner time, the more I appreciate authors who can conjure up images of good food, too. Madeleines anyone?


Steve :-)

With all the twistedness, I'm hoping for one bit of clarification. When the old man swallowed himself, what happened to the undigested spoon? I hope his wife got that back, at least.

BTW, you're right, Mark, that my appetite's been suppressed.


message 49: by Traveller (last edited Sep 18, 2013 08:54PM) (new) - added it

Traveller Talking of double-speak...this whole review and the book it reviews illustrates the point quite well!


Steve I think I see what you mean, Traveller -- sort of like speaking through both sides of my mouth, or my butt, or something.


« previous 1
back to top