User reviews

If I ever were to host some kind of film class, I would just show Nick Millard marathons every single class so everyone would know what not to do. Nick Millard movies are fascinatingly inept, hopelessly tiresome, dreadfully boring, which just makes it all the weirder that I can't stop watching them. It's almost like he's hypnotizing you. It's almost like he's a spider luring you into his barely cinematic web. It's beautiful. No, it's atrocious. I need help. I need more Nick Millard movies. I don't know anymore.

I feel like I should elaborate. Every Nick Millard movie is sort of the same, in a way that it's all over the place but at the same time horribly repetitive and predictable. From the "Death Nurse" movies to "Crazy Fat Ethel II" to "Cemetery Sisters", Nick Millard always follows the same formula of boring you to death until you somehow want more. "Doctor Bloodbath" is no different. It's a tiring loop that you have to go through for all eternity (or 57 minutes, but you'll soon forget the difference when this is on). Doctor Bloodbath performs an abortion (with what is clearly a turkey baister) in his clinic, then he visits the patients at their house and kills them, and then back to square A. No surprises, no suspense, no pace whatsoever (our doctor seems to just sit on the couch for most of the time), you always know exactly what's going to happen. And yet, there's a unique Millardness to all these proceedings that pulls you in and doesn't let you go until you've finally seen it all (twice).

An important reason why I end up watching Nick's movies is just to see how lazy he can actually get. "Crazy Fat Ethel II" was essentially just "Crazy Fat Ethel I" with about 20 minutes of new footage. Even "Death Nurse" is chock full of stock footage from "Crazy Fat Ethel", and that's not even (officially) a sequel. "Cemetery Sesters" crams in ten straight minutes from "Satan's Black Wedding" for no reason whatsoever. In a recent interview Nick has stated that he does this because he wants people to discover his earlier works. Let me state right now that this explanation makes about as much sense as his movies do. He does it because filming an entire movie is a lot of work, even with a camcorder. But I've got to say though, "Doctor Bloodbath" is almost an entire movie. In an absolutely hilarious scene he does kill a character from "Satan's Black Wedding" because hey, the backgrounds vaguely match so why not, but overall this movie does it all by itself. Albeit with credits from a different movie taped from a TV screen, but making credits is such a hassle so I understand.

There's more good news about "Doctor Bloodbath": it's not quite as mind-numbing as the usual Millard dreck. Sometimes it almost seems like you're watching a real movie. Millard still hasn't figured out that you can have people talk to each other while they're in the same room (the grating hard edits are an attraction on their own), but at least actors are in the same shot here and there. There's even an ambitious kill scene where we get an overhead shot of the killer approaching the victim. That's as close to suspense as Nick is ever going to get. And at one point you actually see the weapon hit one of the girls (or rather, a super-obvious fake head). That's completely unseen in a Millard film, take my word for it if you don't know the joys of his cinema. And of course the typical Millardisms are here too. The police inspector talking about "the other two victims" when there have already been four murders, the doctor yelling "murderer!" while chopping up a victim, every single thing the Polish poet character says, the thunderous applause you hear after the doctor gives a speech in a clearly empty and clearly tiny room, Millard die-hards will have fun with this I guess. I know I did.

Normally I keep reviews short and to the point, but there's just something about Millard that brings out the worst in me. I could write so much on this wonderfully untalented filmmaker, but you just have to experience him yourself. I promise you you'll never be the same again.

Wow! What a fun and awful time I just had when I found this movie at a site, which I created an account there (the website name is VeeHD), posted by my good friend Komrads. Just take a look at the title. It just makes you want to go see the movie. It made me wanna see it, I wanted to! But after fifty six minutes of my life I've sat though this mess I'd rather grab my VHS and watch Death Nurse on a endless loop, because this movie was so bad it didn't feel like a movie. It felt like a home video that Nick and his family recorded because they had nothing better to do. Instead of using the CI footage (the entire stock was just that cemetery scene nobody cares about) Nick now intends to use stock footage from Satan's Black Wedding, by which, why? That movie had darkened lightning so it just doesn't fit. Most of the actresses I didn't care for. They are sexy, but they are not good for their career. And this is where I say Typical Nick. The deaths are always the same trash. Kill the woman and show the remains for almost a second, and loads of cheesy special effects. No babies were harmed by the making of this "movie".

Doctor Bloodbath, or Butcher Knife, is a um... movie, more or less, about a doctor who murders woman he's performed abortions on. Why is he doing that? No idea, there is basically no motivation provided for his actions, nor any insight into how it all started. As a viewer you're just dumped in the middle of a series of repetitive murders with no real beginning or meaningful conclusion. Every aspect of this movie is just bad, writing, acting, cinematography, editing, lighting, sound design, and really, I'm being generous here by suggesting that there was intentional lighting or sound design involved. Honestly, if you told me that they shot and edited this entire thing in a weekend with no script, not only would I believe you, but it would make the existence of this thing a lot easier to comprehend.

Doctor Bloodbath is one of the few movies I've seen that makes me question if it should even be considered a movie. It's more like about an hour of moving pictures and sometimes sound which vaguely resembles a narrative, something that seems enough like a movie that a few unfortunate souls may be tricked into handing over actual money for it. And while I will accept a bad movie, I will not tolerate a deceptive one, and that's what this is, it literally uses the opening credits from another movie to make it look like it had a cast and crew that it did not. (Which I guess might be a good thing for the actors who were actually in it) Also fully like half of the film is padding, like changes in location are often accompanied by painful long driving and walking scenes, and just lots of other necessarily long shots that add absolutely nothing to the film other than run time, and several of aforementioned unnecessary padding scenes are actually the same footage used multiple times. However, the weirdest, and most notable thing is the repeated use of clips from other movies, and I don't mean something like a stock footage establishing shot, they literally cut to shots from Nick Millard's earlier films in the middle of scenes, sometimes the characters actually talk with the characters from the reused clips. It's like something out of a late-night talk show sketch, but not intentionally a joke.

It is not merely a movie, it is an experience! A swirl of hilarity, adultery, murder, mayhem, amateurish cinematography, and recycled film footage! When it comes to weapons, he has varied taste, ranging from hammers to cleavers, and of course, knives. Meanwhile, his wife is at it with a Polish poet, who eventually impregnates her (and this pregnancy is implied). His routine is: To go to the home of the patient, murder her, and go home to twiddle his thumbs while his wife goes to see the poet. He is seen performing an abortion on his wife, Claire, and a patient, Donna, whom he fatally hammers in the back of her head.