Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
5.3.Unsignalized intersection :
An intersection not controlled by traffic signals.The control
advice provided at an unsignalized intersection can be a stop sign, or yield
sign, or no sign at all .At unsignalized intersections with no sign ,traffic
flow is governed by right –of-way-law.
The analytic procedures of unsignalized intersections types:
1. Two –way stop-controlled intersections:
Two –way stop-controlled intersections are a common type of
intersection in the United States and aboard . stop signs are used to
indicate preferential right –of-way and to control movement at such
intersections. At two –way stop-controlled intersections, the stop
controlled approaches are referred to as minor –street approaches.
the intersection approaches are not controlled by stop signs are
referred to as major –street approaches.
At three- legged intersection is considered to be a stander type of TWSC
intersection if the single minor street approach, such as the stem of a T
configuration ,is controlled by stop signs. Three- legged intersection,
where two of three approaches are controlled by stop signs, represent a
special form of unsignalized intersections.
1 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
At two –way stop-controlled intersections, preferential right –of-way
among conflicting traffic stream is indicated by four ranks of hierarchy :
Rank1, Rank2, Rank3, Rank4.
Note :three- legged intersection have only three ranks.
Rank1:
1. movements have the highest priority.
2. movements are through and right –turn movements on major – street
approaches.
3. All conflicting movements yield to Rank1 movements.
2 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
Rank2:
1. movements have the second highest priority.
2. movements are left –turn movements on major – street approaches
and right –turn movements on minor – street approaches.
3. movements yield only to Rank1 movements.
Rank3:
1. movements have the third highest priority.
2. movements are through movements on minor-street approaches.
3. movements yield to Rank1 and movements Rank2.
3 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
Rank4:
1. movements have the lowest priority.
2. movements are left –turn movements on minor – street
approaches.
3. movements yield to all other conflicting movements.
4 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
5.4.All-way stop-controlled(AWST):
At an all-way stop-controlled intersections a stop sign is provided
on each of the approaches . AWST require that every vehicle stop at the
intersection before proceeding .since each driver must stop, the judgment
as the whether to proceed into the intersection is a function of traffic
conditions on the other approaches. If there is no traffic present on the
approaches ,a driver can proceed immediately after a stop is made. If there
is traffic on one or more of the other approaches, a driver proceed only
when after determining that there are no vehicles. Currently in the
intersection and it is his or her turn to proceed.
Field observation show that AWST intersections operate in either two –
phase or four –phase, based primarily on the complexity of the intersection
geometry. Flows are determined by a consensus of right –of-way that
alternate between the north-south and east –west stream for a single-lane
approach or proceeds in turn to each intersection approach for a multilane
approach intersection .
5 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
Flow at an all-way stop controlled intersections in characterized by five
cases that reflect all possible departure conditions on the subject approach:
In case one ,no traffic is present on the other approaches. The subject
vehicle departs as rapidly as it can safely accelerate into and clear the
intersection. case one produces the shortest possible saturation headway
for the subject approach.
In case two, traffic is present on the opposing approaches. There is some
uncertainty introduced with a vehicle present on the opposing approaches.
Thus case two produces the longer saturation headway than case one.
6 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
In case three, traffic is present on the conflicting approaches. Vehicles on
one of the conflicting approaches further restrict the departure rate of
vehicles on the subject approach. case three produces the longer saturation
headway than case one and case two.
In case four, traffic is present on any two other approaches. Case four
produces the longer saturation headway than case one, case two, and
case three .
7 Civil Engineering - Third stage
Traffic Wisam Abdulla Najim ALHalfi
In case five , traffic is present on all other approaches. saturation headway
are even longer than for the other cases as the potential for conflict
between vehicles is greatest .The increasing degree of potential conflict
translate directly into longer driver decision times and saturation
headways.
8 Civil Engineering - Third stage
