Capiz State University- Main Campus
College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology
Fuentes Drive Roxas City
A HERITAGE CONSERVATION EDUCATIONAL FIELD TRIP OUTPUT
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in course
SPECS 421: Heritage Conservation
Submitted by:
Angelo S. Dongon
BS Architecture 4 – A
Submitted to:
Rev. Fr. Ar. Dennis Dexter A. Sontillano, S.Th.L. – M.A.
Part-time Instructor
April 16, 2024
I. Introduction
As the world continuously grows and modernizes, many structures that are considered
to be “old” and “past-its-time” are often marked as structures for condemnation—from old
warehouses, to towns or districts— or demolished to make way for new development and for
putting up structures that are more modern and deemed to generate and attract more income.
We have, however, also developed a new architectural approach known as "Adaptive Reuse"
since the field of architecture continues to grow and diversify.
According to Prosoco Inc. (2021), The process of modifying or changing an old
structure for a new use or purpose is known as "adaptive reuse." The notion of adaptive reuse
bears some relation to historic preservation or restoration projects, but it is distinct from them.
Restoring a building's original feature or component is a common goal of historic preservation
and restoration. As we delve further into this paper, I will now be introducing my chosen
structure which is the “Aduana De Iloilo” also known as “Iloilo Customs House”. It is located
Muelle Loney St. in Iloilo City. The two-storey building with a tower rising at the middle was
built in 1916 following the plans done by Ralph Harrington Doane, the consulting Architect of
the Bureau of Public Works. The structure became more prominent in the port of Iloilo because
of the Tower rising at the center of the building and it also is strategically located as it overlooks
the Batiano River and the Straits of Iloilo. It is the second largest and second oldest of the three
American-era customs houses in the Philippines (after Manila's, currently called Malacañang
sa Sugbo).
II. Historical Significance
The Aduana De Iloilo was built in 1916 and is linked to the historical growth of Iloilo since the
founding of the international port in 1855. The Building was mainly utilized by various office
such as trading operations,
including registering the kind and
quantity of products and paying
the associated charges imposed on
them. Iloilo has been a major city
outside of Manila and Luzon when
it comes to exporting and importing
Figure 1. Iloilo Customs House under construction and
commodities to and from other
nearing completion, 1916 | Elizabeth Tower Baird |
Ortigas Foundation Library via Nereo Cajilig Luján
regions of the world, as evidenced
by the port and customs house. This expansion is in line with Iloilo's rapidly expanding
economy, which is centered on the production of sugar and extensive sugarcane farming. As
Iloilo developed into a major trading hub with direct access to the world market, it earned the
moniker "Queen City of the South."
The Iloilo Custons House underwent repair and reconstruction in 1983-1984 during the
administration and incumbency of commissioner Ramon J. Farolan And Iloilo District
Collector Gilberto G. Castro. Through the initiative and effort of Budget Minister Manuel 5.
Alba, Assemblymen Niel D. Tupa's and Fermin Z. Caram, Jr. Supervised by Mpwh Regional
Office Under regional director Rodolfo T. Lataquin.
Recognized as a heritage structure, the Iloilo customs house underwent renovation from
2017 to 2018, and the project was initiated by the National Historical Commission of the
Philippines (NHCP). The renovation project entails refinishing the floor, repairing the windows
and doors, and strengthening the concrete walls. The building's roof was replaced, and the eaves
were reinforced as well. The customs building's tower, a significant component of the complex,
has been returned to its original condition.
In 2021, additional repair work was done on
the Iloilo customs house in order to prepare
the ground floor for the Museum of
Philippine Maritime History. Partition
removal, replacing missing or damaged
decorative moldings, installing new
Figure 2. Albeit in need of restoration, the
flooring, doors, and windows, repainting, Aduana Building on Muelle Loney Street remains
imposing | Photo scanned: Reynaldo Gamboa
plumbing, electrical, and mechanical work Alejandro and Vicente Roman Santos in Estilo
Ilonggo: Philippine Southern Lifestyle published
were some of the tasks completed. by KCC Innovations in cooperation
And as it stands Today, The Iloilo Customs House is currently being housed by the
“Museum of Philippine Maritime History” of NHCP at the ground floor and the office of”
Bureau of Customs” at the upper ground floor.
III. Artistic Significance
As one approaches the port of Iloilo, the
customs building is a prominent landmark because of
its distinctive architecture and neo-classical style. The
Iloilo Customs House is designed in the neoclassical
architectural style, which is distinguished by its great
scale, the simplicity of its geometric shapes, its
dramatic use of columns, and its predilection for empty
walls.
Figure 3. Iloilo Customs House as seen
from the Bridge. Photo taken by:
Angelo S. Dongon
The photo shows how the current
state of the Museum of Philippine Maritime
History used a wise application of the empty
walls to create a sense of grandeur and
evokes a strong contrast of the scale of the
building compared to its visitors or
occupants.
Figure 4. Interior of the Receiving Area of the
Museum. Photo Taken by: Angelo S. Dongon
Another notable feature of the interior of the
Museum is the elaborate ceiling design in which they
use a repetitive octagon and diamond pattern creating
this welcoming vibe as the gold and white color
scheme seems to capture your attention and draws in
guests, making them want to go inside and look further
into the museum.
Figure 5. Ceiling Design of the
Museum. Photo Taken by: Jovit Laton
BSA-4B
And lastly the facade that captures the essence of
a Neo-classical Architectural style with its great scale,
the simplicity of its geometric shapes and its dramatic
use of columns which could also be seen in the interior.
Figure 6. Facade of The Museum of
Philippine Maritime History. Photo
Taken by: Angelo S. Dongon
IV. Conclusion
Our generation's rapid urbanization and the development of new technological
advancements in architecture are widely evident in the way urban districts have planned the
land or space. As a result of these developments, a plethora of interconnected structures that
are invisible to the naked eye have been created. And because of the belief that everything that
isn't profitable or doesn't look "modern," it should be demolished, this poses a threat to our
heritage structures. On the other hand, despite all of the modernism, urban and city planners
have chosen to preserve and conserve our cultural heritage structures. They have taken on this
challenge because they recognize the importance of these structures in shaping or paving the
way for the city or community to flourish into its current state.
The reason as to why we preserve or protect them is that they hold a specific moment
of time, they hold our history, our identity as citizens of that city. Aside from its distinct
architectural value, it embodies our values, our cultural identity and historic continuity. Our
legacy is the foundation of mankind and gives us association with our verifiable past and human
culture, as well as these sites helps maintain a connection to the past, fostering a sense of
belonging and continuity for present and future generations and protecting our patrimony helps
remind people of their historical roots and identity and can serve to bind the nation together.
One thing that planners could not see is that our connection to our past is an essential
factor to understand the identity and how the city emerged from that, and disregarding that
mere fact, will alienate any existing development for it has forgotten its connection with the
city or community cultural identity. On a final note let me ask you a question, will we succumb
to these modernist ideologies and let our dwindling sense of history being razed to the ground?
Or will we endure and preserve these structures for they hold a moment in history, the stories
these structures tell, for the future generation to inherit a diverse and culturally rich urban
landscape? Let that sink in for a bit.