MGT305 Theory
MGT305 Theory
2
the past five years highlight the deep-rooted issues of corruption and
bribery within Malaysia's political and governmental institutions.
Data indicates that the growing number of anti-corruption agencies
are facing significant challenges in their efforts.
However, the implementation of new measures such as corporate
liability for corruption offenses in Malaysia could potentially mark a
significant step towards combating corruption and bribery.
Corruption is a complex and multifaceted issue, commonly defined as
the misuse of public power and violation of regulations for personal
gain.
While there is a common belief that corruption is mainly carried out
by government officials, it can occur in various sectors and involve
individuals beyond the government.
Corruption cases in Malaysia encompass a range of offenses such as
bribery, extortion, fraud, embezzlement, blackmail, illegal gambling,
money laundering, and nepotism, all of which involve the misuse of
public power and authority.
This includes public officials accepting or offering bribes in exchange
for money or services, which is fundamentally dishonest.
Ultimately, corruption represents an abuse of entrusted power for
personal benefit, reflecting poor governance practices and
undermining the legitimacy of the state.
The impact of corruption cases in Malaysia
Corruption not only has social, political, and economic repercussions
but also arises from the distortion of laws and the weakening of
institutional foundations crucial for economic growth.
Moreover, it poses a threat to democracy, contributes to income
inequality, and places a burden on taxpayers.
At a national level, corruption undermines free and fair trade.
3
While corruption has negative consequences wherever it exists, its
impact is particularly heightened in developing nations.
Corruption diminishes the economic resources available to address
social, economic, and political challenges that may impede
development.
This issue has the most significant impact on society by hindering
economic growth, government spending, and investments.
It disproportionately affects the poor, exacerbating income inequality
and poverty.
From a business standpoint, corruption also reduces the efficiency of
companies and raises business costs.
The promotion of integrity and the fight against corruption have
become essential goals in Malaysia due to the prevalence of
corruption and its evident impact on the social, political, and economic
landscape.
It is estimated that corruption could cost Malaysia up to RM10 billion
annually, equivalent to 2.3 billion $USD, representing around 2% of
the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
The Asian financial crisis has served as a catalyst for anti-corruption
efforts, altering public perceptions of corrupt practices and bringing
the issue to the forefront of public policy.
What the statistics say?
According to the 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index reported by
Transparency International, Malaysia ranks as the 62nd least corrupt
nation out of 180 countries.
However, data indicates that efforts to address corruption in Malaysia
have not been successful.
Over 66% of the public believes that there has been no improvement
in transparency and integrity levels within both the public and private
sectors.
4
Furthermore, in 2007, 47% of corporate managers admitted to being
involved in bribery within the past 12 months or knowing someone
who had been involved in bribery during that period.
The police were identified as having the highest levels of corruption,
followed by other enforcement agencies such as customs departments
and roads and transport.
In 2020, Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PWC) reported that the most
disruptive forms of fraud experienced in Malaysian organizations were
asset misappropriation, bribery and corruption, customer fraud, and
cybercrime, accounting for 70% of all economic crimes in Malaysia.
Additionally, public procurement is identified as a sector in Malaysia
with high levels of corruption, where Malaysian companies are given
preference over foreign competitors due to political connections.
Addressing corruption
The impacts of corruption highlighted previously have prompted a
wide range of measures to address corruption within Malaysia.
The Malaysian Government has recognized the detrimental effects of
corruption on economic growth.
This has resulted in various entities being tasked with addressing
corruption and implementing numerous measures to minimize and
eventually eliminate it.
The promotion of integrity within society is a key outcome of anti-
corruption efforts.
The fight against corruption in Malaysia commenced with the
establishment of the Anti-Corruption Agency in 1967.
This included the Malaysian Administrative Modernization and
Management Planning Unit, the Anti-Corruption Agency, the Auditor
General's Office, the Public Accounts Committee, and the Public
Complaints Bureau.
5
Initial successes involved the prosecution of several political leaders
and senior civil servants.
Despite these efforts, corruption levels remained high.
Research has indicated that these institutions have been ineffective in
combating corruption, as evidenced by ongoing cases of illicit
transactions and misconduct.
However, since 2003, the government has prioritized anti-corruption
efforts, with Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi acknowledging in
2003 that combating corruption would be a key focus.
This led to the introduction of various initiatives, such as the National
Integrity Plan in 2005, aimed at fostering a culture of integrity.
Subsequently, the Malaysian Institute of Integrity (MII) was
established to support, coordinate, and implement the National
Integrity Plan.
More recently, the Transformational Program has been launched by
the government to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption
measures.
This includes the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC),
which commenced operations in 2009 and reports to a Parliamentary
Special Committee on Corruption.
Case of corruption and bribery
There has been a significant number of corruption cases in Malaysia
that have persisted for decades, despite increased efforts to address
these issues.
Various instances of corruption will be examined to determine the
extent of corruption involved and the methods used to investigate and
expose them.
The 1MDB scandal in 2015 stands out as one of the most notable
corruption cases in Malaysia, implicating the former Prime Minister
Najib Razak and the 1 Malaysia Development Fund Bhd (1MDB).
6
This corruption scandal revolved around the misappropriation of
billions of US dollars through fraudulent declarations made by officials.
Established in 2009, the 1MDB was originally known as the
Terengganu Investment Authority (TIA) and evolved into a series of
partnerships between Aabar Investments PJSC and Petro Saudi
International.
It is estimated that over US$ 6.5 billion was funneled through the
1MDB, financing the lavish lifestyles of corrupt officials and their
associates.
Apart from embezzlement and bribery, the 1MDB scandal also
involved money laundering, which entailed the receipt and
concealment of funds from illicit sources.
This contravened Malaysia's anti-money laundering regulations, with
banks serving as conduits and beneficiaries of these illicit funds,
thereby violating their anti-money laundering obligations.
Furthermore, false declarations and bond mispricing between 2009
and 2014 were prevalent forms of corruption within this scandal,
including the falsification of 1MDB's financial status to Malaysian
banks.
Among the recipients of these false declarations was the Bank Negara
(Malaysian Central Bank).
The investigation into the 1MDB scandal in 2015 shed light on various
factors contributing to the widespread corruption and bribery that
took place.
It was revealed that the existing governance mechanisms were flawed,
resulting in inadequate oversight over expenditures, loans, and
investments within 1MDB.
This encompassed decisions being made beyond the purview of the
board of directors, with the board receiving misleading and inaccurate
information, indicating non-compliance with the Companies Act of
1965 of the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance.
7
The investigation into the 1MDB scandal in 2015 shed light on various
factors contributing to the widespread corruption and bribery that
took place.
It was revealed that the existing governance mechanisms were flawed,
resulting in inadequate oversight over expenditures, loans, and
investments within 1MDB.
This encompassed decisions being made beyond the purview of the
board of directors, with the board receiving misleading and inaccurate
information, indicating non-compliance with the Companies Act of
1965 of the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance.
Given that Najib held the positions of both Prime Minister and
Chairman of the 1MDB Advisory Board, there was a notable absence
of political will, as there was no authority above him to address the
corruption.
Political influence further hindered efforts to combat the corruption,
leading to the dismissal of the Attorney General and the intimidation
of MACC officers.
Moreover, there were insufficient internal regulations within
Malaysian banks, as well as internationally, to prevent money
laundering, facilitating the illicit flow of funds.
Consequently, the scandal resulted in two significant repercussions:
1. The Malaysian Government was compelled to allocate US$1.66 billion
towards debt servicing payments.
2. There was a substantial loss of public trust, particularly towards
politicians and government officials.
The fallout of corruption cases in Malaysia
Efforts to address corruption in Malaysia have been extensive, yet the
issue persists with significant economic and social consequences.
8
The high level of corruption raises doubts about the efficacy of anti-
corruption measures, such as those implemented by MACC to
investigate corruption at upper echelons.
However, the agency's subordination to the Prime Minister's office
hampers its ability to prosecute high-profile cases effectively.
Various factors contribute to the prevalence of corruption in Malaysia,
including the failure to combat political corruption and shortcomings
in the country's political structures, culture, and institutions.
Moreover, government initiatives aimed at curbing corruption face
challenges such as lack of public support, failure to address underlying
causes, and bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Furthermore, it is imperative to implement more robust strategies to
prevent corruption.
This involves incorporating corporate social responsibility practices,
which involves assessing and mitigating a company's risk of bribery
and corruption as part of its overall approach to corporate social
responsibility.
By doing so, corruption cases in Malaysia can be addressed from
within the government, rather than solely relying on external methods
to track and investigate corruption.
Moreover, it is essential to establish more effective measures to
prevent corruption.
This encompasses the adoption of corporate social responsibility
practices, which involves evaluating and mitigating a company's
susceptibility to bribery and corruption as part of its comprehensive
corporate social responsibility approach.
This approach will ensure that corruption cases in Malaysia are
addressed internally by the government, rather than solely focusing
on external methods for monitoring and investigating corruption.
Summary
9
Due to the intricate nature of corruption cases in Malaysia, stemming
from economic and political factors, efforts to address this issue are
challenging.
The detrimental effects of corruption, such as hindering economic
development, exacerbating income inequality, and eroding trust in
governmental and political institutions, underscore the importance of
eliminating corruption for the benefit of Malaysia's economic, social,
and political spheres.
This would result in improved per capita income growth, increased
foreign investment inflow, and enhanced business expansion.
Despite the existing initiatives by both traditional and modern anti-
corruption bodies and policies, it is imperative to sustain and adapt
these measures to effectively reduce corruption cases in Malaysia
moving forward.
Discussion
Evaluate the financial scandal related to the Saigon Joint Stock
Commercial Bank (SCB) and Van Thinh Phat as the focus of the case
analysis.
10
Ecofeminism
Introduction
Ecofeminism is a philosophical perspective that highlights the
relationship between women and the environment, focusing on their
shared experiences of oppression within a patriarchal framework.
Advocates of this ideology promote a different worldview that honors
the Earth as sacred and acknowledges the intrinsic reliance of humanity
on the natural environment.
Women constitute approximately half of the worldwide population and
have a crucial impact on advancing ecological health.
Nevertheless, challenges emerge when societal structures fail to provide
women and other marginalized communities with the necessary
opportunities to contribute to the betterment of our planet.
Ecofeminism merges environmental advocacy with feminist principles,
establishing a comprehensive strategy for sustainability and equity.
Ecofeminists argue that the subjugation of women and the degradation
of the environment are closely linked.
Therefore, eco-feminism asserts that both environmental preservation
and gender equality are fundamental for any prospective progress.
There is a noticeable rise in the impact of ecofeminism on daily life due
to the growing acknowledgment of the interconnection between social
and environmental concerns.
Key areas of contention include intimacy, the body, and sexuality, with
young women striving to dismantle patriarchal norms in intimate
relationships.
Notably, environmental movements spearheaded by women in South
America appear to be the most resilient, even if they do not self-identify
as ecofeminists.
11
In India, indigenous women affected by deforestation initiated a
movement to preserve forests, while a similar endeavor was launched in
Kenya by Wangari Maathai to address the specific needs of rural women.
These instances underscore the significance of involving and
collaborating with women in efforts aimed at fostering a sustainable
future through development.
The power of the Patriarchy
The impact of patriarchy on the ecological crisis must be analyzed in
terms of its role as a driving force behind the crisis due to its
underlying beliefs.
Patriarchy, characterized by notions of superiority and control, plays a
significant role in exacerbating the climate emergency by promoting
human domination over the environment.
Moreover, patriarchy fuels the ecological crisis by fostering a culture
of excessive consumption and materialism within society.
The patriarchal system fuels excessive consumption by imposing
unrealistic standards and demands on women.
This leads to the perpetuation of trends that persuade people to
constantly buy new products or risk becoming outdated.
Consequently, individuals find themselves trapped in a never-ending
cycle of overconsumption, whether it be in the realm of fashion or
seasonal decorations.
Many individuals feel compelled to conform to patriarchal norms by
making purchases, but this behavior ultimately harms the
environment through pollution and waste.
In patriarchal societies, women are often viewed as inferior to men,
and this perception is reinforced by the association of women with
nature.
This harmful attitude towards nature is then extended through the
patriarchal lens, leading to the assertion of dominance and the lack of
12
respect towards the environment, mirroring the historical
mistreatment of women.
Ironically, women play a significant role intending to the environment,
particularly through activities such as agriculture, highlighting how the
patriarchy exploits women's labor and expertise.
The patriarchal system thrives on greed and extractive practices. The
exploitation of women is mirrored in the exploitation of the
environment.
This dynamic is evident in capitalist societies, where consumption
patterns are heavily influenced.
Moreover, this pattern is reinforced through the continuous growth of
the economy, particularly in the extraction of resources such as coal
and oil.
Embracing a feminist approach to the ecological crisis can lead to a
more comprehensive and inclusive understanding of the
interconnected nature of the system.
By integrating various aspects of ecology, it is possible to discover
alternatives to extractivism.
Addressing systemic issues in this manner can contribute to the
healing of the earth's systems through interconnectedness.
Moreover, this shift can establish stability for future generations,
drawing from the traditional concept of maternalism and the
construction of the future through reproduction.
[Extractivism involves the extraction of natural resources from the
Earth for sale on the global market. This productive process entails the
removal of valuable resources from the land or underground, which
are subsequently marketed as commodities worldwide. Extractivism is
a key component of economies that rely heavily on the extraction and
exportation of natural resources.]
13
Moving away from the misogynistic view of reproduction and a
woman's role, and instead focusing on empowering women in this
process, can cultivate future generations with the principles of
ecofeminism, fostering progress in social issues rooted in
empowerment.
This increased support and education can also yield positive ecological
effects, as women's empowerment aligns with population control and
social justice activism.
Additionally, the strategies employed by the feminist movement can
be applied to combatting the ecological crisis.
Past Existence
Throughout history, numerous environmental movements have been
spearheaded by women.
A notable example is the Chipko Movement in India during the 1970s,
where women from rural communities engaged in a non-violent
struggle to safeguard forests from government-sanctioned logging,
aiming to maintain ecological balance and uphold traditional practices.
These women were particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of
environmental degradation, as they were responsible for agriculture,
household management, and livestock care, making them more
susceptible to the consequences of landslides exacerbated by
deforestation.
The increase in logging activities intensified the severity of landslides,
leading to significant destruction across various facets of their lives.
Consequently, these women felt compelled to confront the
government to secure their means of survival.
The Chipko Movement is often regarded as an early manifestation of
ecofeminism, primarily due to its leadership by women and its
emphasis on female empowerment as a catalyst for ecological
preservation (Petruzzello 2019).
14
Ecofeminism posits that environmentalism should address social
injustices that marginalize certain groups, drawing on the values and
actions of those directly affected.
Through their non-violent protests, these women not only protected
their environment but also preserved their cultural heritage.
Furthermore, the movement represented a critique of capitalism and
colonialism, as it sought to address social inequalities while promoting
the enhancement and protection of local ecosystems.
What is the importance of Ecofeminism?
Eco-feminism is commonly understood as a critique of traditional
environmentalism, which is often considered to be a movement
dominated by men.
Eco-feminists argue that traditional environmentalism has frequently
emphasized the preservation of "nature" without acknowledging the
impact of environmental degradation on the diverse population of our
planet.
Eco-feminists maintain that to establish a truly sustainable society, we
must consider all forms of oppression, including gender, race, and
class.
The United Nations reports that women contribute to as much as 80%
of food production across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
Globally, women play a crucial role in the conservation of biodiversity
and the management of natural resources.
Their expertise in traditional land management practices is vital for
sustainable development, as they often excel in utilizing local
resources and possess a deeper understanding of their communities
and environments.
According to the United Nations website, "Only 29% of featured
speakers at international ocean science conferences are women."
(Gender Equity in Oceanography)
15
To achieve our sustainable development goals by 2030, it is imperative
to involve women in decision-making processes.
The participation of women in decision-making contributes to a higher
level of engagement in sustainable development efforts.
This, in turn, ensures that the diverse needs of the community are
considered, leading to more efficient and successful development
initiatives.
Women play a crucial role in agriculture, as they represent a
significant portion of the global agricultural workforce and are often
responsible for the care of crops and livestock.
Through the adoption of sustainable farming techniques like organic
agriculture and agroforestry, women farmers can mitigate
environmental harm and enhance soil quality.
Some critics argue that ecofeminism is not a viable approach to
establishing a sustainable and fair society, claiming that it places
excessive emphasis on emotions and interpersonal connections
without adequately considering the economic and political dynamics
at play.
Despite the emotional and relational aspects of ecofeminism, it offers
a valuable perspective for comprehending the interrelated nature of
societal and environmental concerns.
It underscores the inherent gender biases within existing economic
and political structures and emphasizes the interconnectedness
between the health of the planet and the welfare of all living beings.
By highlighting the shared experiences of oppression between humans
and the environment, ecofeminism presents an effective strategy for
cultivating a society that is both fair and sustainable.
It is comparable to repairing a leaky boat while still on it – addressing
the underlying causes of the issue is essential before any meaningful
progress can be achieved.
16
Ecofeminism offers a perspective that recognizes the
interconnectedness of people and the environment, aiming to
promote greater equity within society.
Summary
1. Women, who are already vulnerable in society, will face even
greater challenges due to climate change. CARE's 2020 report, Evicted
by Climate Change, emphasizes that women in developing countries
are heavily impacted as they are the primary providers of food, water,
and fuel for their families. As climate change worsens, their
responsibilities become more difficult. It is clear that women are, and
will continue to be, highly susceptible to the consequences of the
climate crisis and environmental deterioration.
The recent IPCC report has highlighted the role of human activities in
climate change and the urgent need to transform our production and
consumption patterns to achieve a decarbonized economy. Those
responsible for environmental harm must take accountability to
ensure a sustainable environment for current and future generations.
Environmental ethics, as proposed by Jonas, aligns with the need for
significant changes in economic practices related to production and
consumption. These changes are essential to protect our environment
and safeguard the resources on which humanity depends.
Women, who are already vulnerable in society, will face even greater
challenges due to climate change. CARE's 2020 report,
Evicted by Climate Change, emphasizes that women in developing
countries are heavily impacted as they are the primary providers of
food, water, and fuel for their families.
As climate change worsens, their responsibilities become more
difficult.
Women are, and will continue to be, highly susceptible to the
consequences of the climate crisis and environmental deterioration.
17
The recent IPCC report has highlighted the role of human activities in
climate change and the urgent need to transform our production and
consumption patterns to achieve a decarbonized economy.
Those responsible for environmental harm must take accountability to
ensure a sustainable environment for current and future generations.
Environmental ethics, as proposed by Jonas, aligns with the need for
significant changes in economic practices related to production and
consumption.
These changes are essential to protect our environment and safeguard
the resources on which humanity depends.
Women play a crucial role in achieving intergenerational equity. They
have been leaders in environmental conservation for generations.
Their traditional knowledge and skills are essential in building
resilience to climate impacts and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Khadidjath Zimé Arouna, a beneficiary of the Green Amazones
Program, highlighted the importance of women in finding sustainable
solutions to the climate crisis within their communities.
Ecofeminism is an environmental ethics movement that focuses on
gender relations and domination in environmental protection. It
emphasizes principles such as equity, inclusive decision-making, and
collective action.
These principles are at the core of climate justice, which aims to
safeguard the rights of the most vulnerable and ensure an equitable
distribution of benefits and burdens related to climate change.
Therefore, promoting ecofeminism is promoting climate justice.
To achieve climate justice, international policies, democratic
institutions, and major organizations need to consider women's
experiences more.
18
They should support women leaders and activists in the ecofeminist
movement and create a space where these women can share their
ideas and opinions freely.
Social Ecology
What is Ecology?
Social ecology is defined as the study of how human beings interact
with and respond to their environment, and how these interactions
and relationships influence society.
The field of social ecology examines society holistically, attempting to
understand exactly how society’s collective environmental problems
stem from social problems, social interaction, and interaction with the
environment.
Social ecology applies ecological concepts to studying human society,
as human beings and non-human beings initially originate similarly.
Introduction:
Meaning:
a coherent radical critique of current social, political, and anti-
ecological trends.
a reconstructive, ecological, communitarian, and ethical approach to
society.
Social Ecology supports a reconstructive and transformative
perspective on social and environmental challenges, advocating for a
directly democratic, confederal political system.
It aims to create a moral economy that transcends scarcity and
hierarchy, striving for a harmonious relationship between human
societies and the environment, all while embracing diversity,
creativity, and freedom.
19
Core ideas
An ecological philosophy
Social Ecology maintains that human beings and human society are
not “separate” from nature but are developments of natural
evolution.
We seek to understand nature dialectically, as an unfolding historical
process of continuous change and development towards expanding
diversity, interdependence, and subjectivity.
A social critique and social analysis
Destructive relationships between ourselves and the rest of nature are
not innate to human beings but are instead outcomes of the particular
social relations structuring our society.
We see ecological problems as social problems, with the domination
of human beings being at the root of attempts to dominate nature.
A revolutionary political theory
The immense potential of humanity lies in the fact that our social
relations are infinitely malleable, such that we can transform society
to reharmonize ourselves with the rest of nature.
This will require an end to hierarchy and domination, achieved
through a social revolution to reorganize society along directly
democratic and communistic lines.
An unabashedly utopian vision
Social Ecology upholds the importance of political imagination, of
actively envisioning fundamentally different possible ways of relating
to one another and the rest of the web of life.
Through the creation of a free society, we imagine bringing humanity’s
self-conscious, creative potential into collaboration rather than
conflict with our ecosystems, so that we may flourish in a positive
keystone ecological role.
20
The principles of Social Ecology
The core fundamental principles of social ecology are that:
1. ecological issues directly result from social issues, and these
environmental problems will only resolve with the amending of
social issues,
2. social factors, such as racism, poverty, sexism, and exploitation
of developing countries lead to environmental problems.
Social ecology prioritizes the establishment of a more egalitarian
society, promoting equality and cooperation with less focus on
individual profiting, which frequently results in so many of our world’s
social injustices.
Social ecology believes that with less inequality in the world, there will
be fewer environmental consequences.
Social Ecology Research
Murray Bookchin, born in 1921 in New York, was a leading thinker in
the field of social ecology.
He wrote extensively about the importance of human relationships to
our environment.
He developed revolutionary ideas, such as deep ecology and social
ecology, that built on the work of European philosophers like Plato
and Rousseau.
Murray Bookchin was an active socialist who had radical critiques of
capitalism.
He is best known for his thoughts on environmentalism and the need
to create a society that will not harm the environment we live in, a
core principle of social ecology.
His work has been influential in shaping our understanding of what it
means to be human: how we are embedded within nature, and how
important it is to protect the Earth from ecological destruction.
21
Example of the Intersection beween Environmental and Social Issues
An example of environmental problems stemming from hierarchical
social issues, the crux of what is studied in the field of social ecology, is
the deforestation of rainforests.
Many communities rely on the natural resources in their nearby
rainforests. However, competitive demand for palm oil results in social
conflict, land grabs, and loss of livelihood.
When large corporations buy up land to take advantage of the high
demand and competition for natural resources, many conflicts occur.
The first social conflict from this problem is between communities and
the corporations that buy their land.
The corporations are essentially stealing the natural resources from
the communities that rely on them.
The next social conflict that occurs is between communities and non-
native workers. Workers that are moved to work in these rainforests
result in fewer jobs for the people who live there.
Another social conflict that occurs is within these local communities,
as often an income gap is created by those who can get jobs working
for these large corporations, and those who do not.
Over 50 million Indonesians rely on their forests for their livelihoods.
Capitalism not only depletes these natural resources when companies
buy and exploit the land but also causes many social and cultural
issues among the native groups and communities.
The Social Ecological Impacts of The Destruction of Rainforests
From a social ecology perspective, one would examine the
environmental impacts of deforestation and exploitation of natural
resources, such as water pollution, air pollution levels, soil erosion,
and flooding, in relationship to capitalism, competition, technological
advancement, and profit.
22
There are varying levels of social issues involved in deforestation,
named above, and social ecology provides a framework to examine
how our relationship to the environment, and our current
environmental issues, results from the different facets of social issues.
Conclusion
Social ecology fundamentally involves the endeavor to establish
conducive and operational surroundings that facilitate the flourishing
of individuals.
This intricate framework commences with comprehending the
interdependence of all societal facets and their influence on
environmental challenges.
Consequently, it is imperative to initially tackle the social issues
prevalent in our world to establish sustainable living standards for all,
including ourselves.
23