0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views3 pages

Legal Review: Mahinay Case

Larry Mahinay was convicted of raping and killing his 12-year-old neighbor Maria Victoria Chan. He confessed to the crime while in police custody without the presence of a lawyer. On appeal, he argued his confession was inadmissible as his constitutional right to counsel was violated. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding that Mahinay was properly informed of his rights and knowingly waived his right to a lawyer before confessing. The Court reiterated the strict procedures that must be followed during custodial investigations to protect a suspect's constitutional rights.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views3 pages

Legal Review: Mahinay Case

Larry Mahinay was convicted of raping and killing his 12-year-old neighbor Maria Victoria Chan. He confessed to the crime while in police custody without the presence of a lawyer. On appeal, he argued his confession was inadmissible as his constitutional right to counsel was violated. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding that Mahinay was properly informed of his rights and knowingly waived his right to a lawyer before confessing. The Court reiterated the strict procedures that must be followed during custodial investigations to protect a suspect's constitutional rights.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

G.R. No. 122485 February 1, 1999 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plai !i""#appellee, $%.

L&RR' (&HIN&' ' &(P&R&)O, a**u%e+#appella !. Fa*!% o" !,e *a%e: Larry Mahinay started working as houseboy for Maria Isip on November 20, 19 !" #he vi$tim, Ma" %i$toria &han, 12 years o'd, was Isip(s neighbor in )ian *treet, who used to p'ay inside Isip+s $ompound" In the evening, Mahinay showed up at Norgina ,ivera(s, uneasy and in deep thought" -is hair was disarrayed. he was drunk and was wa'king in a da/ed manner" Norgina asked why he 'ooked so worried but he did not answer" #hen he 'eft and wa'ked ba$k to the $ompound" Meanwhi'e, 0'vira &han noti$ed that her daughter, Ma" %i$toria, was missing" 1n the fo''owing day, Mahinay boarded a passenger 2eepney at the talipapa, a'ighted at the North 03pressway and disappeared" #hat same morning, around 4:!0, a $ertain 5oy found the dead body of Ma" %i$toria inside the septi$ tank" -er fa$e bore bruises and the resu'ts of the autopsy revea'ed that the $ause of death was asphy3ia by manua' strangu'ation" -er hymen was ta'' and thi$k with $omp'ete 'a$erations and $ongested with b'ood $'ots" Mahinay be$ame a suspe$t in the s'aying, but he $ou'd not be 'o$ated" 6fter a series of fo''ow7up operations, Mahnay was fina''y arrested in 5arangay 1bario Mata'a, Ibaan, 5atangas" -e was brought to the %a'en/ue'a 8o'i$e *tation" 1n 9u'y 4, 199 , with the assistan$e of 6tty" ,estituto %iernes :861;, Mahinay e3e$uted an e3tra72udi$ia' $onfession detai'ing how he raped and ki''ed the vi$tim" -e was then $harged with rape with homi$ide" 6fter tria', the 'ower $ourt rendered a de$ision $onvi$ting Mahinay of the $rime $harged and senten$ed him to death by e'e$tro$ution" ,e$ord of the $ase was forwarded to the *upreme &ourt for automati$ review"

I%%ue% <hether Larry Mahinay+s e3tra72udi$ia' $onfession was admissib'e in $ourt and whether Mahinay+s $onstitutiona' right to $ounse' was vio'ated"

Ruli .: #he $onvi$tion of appe''ant was affirmed by the *upreme &ourt" #he e3tra2udi$ia' $onfession of the appe''ant himse'f admitted that he had se3ua' $ongress with the un$ons$ious $hi'd" #he appe''ant $'aims that his e3tra72udi$ia' $onfession was e3e$uted in vio'ation of his $onstitutiona' right to $ounse'" 1

5ut his $ontention is be'ied by the re$ords as we'' as the testimony of the 'awyer who assisted, warned and e3p'ained to him his $onstitutiona''y guaranteed pre7interrogatory and $ustodia' rights"

In this $ase, the $ourt reiterated the pro$edures to be observed in $ustodia' investigation whi$h are as fo''ows: 1" #he person arrested, detained, invited or under $ustodia' investigation must be informed in a 'anguage known to and understood by him of the reason for the arrest and he must be shown the warrant of arrest, if any. 0very other warnings, information or $ommuni$ation must be in a 'anguage known to and understood by said person. 2" -e must be warned that he has a right to remain si'ent and that anystatement he makes may be used as eviden$e against him. !" -e must be informed that he has the right to be assisted at a'' times and have the presen$e of an independent and $ompetent 'awyer, preferab'y of his own $hoi$e. =" -e must be informed that if he has no 'awyer or $annot afford the servi$es of a 'awyer, one wi'' be provided for him. and that a 'awyer may a'so be engaged by any person in his beha'f, or may be appointed by the $ourt upon petition of the person arrested or one a$ting in his beha'f. " #hat whether or not the person arrested has a 'awyer, he must be informed that no $ustodia' investigation in any form sha'' be $ondu$ted e3$ept in the presen$e of his $ounse' or after a va'id waiver has been made. >" #he person arrested must be informed that, at any time, he has the right to $ommuni$ate or $onfer by the most e3pedient means 7 te'ephone, radio, 'etter or messenger 7 with his 'awyer :either retained or appointed;, any member of his immediate fami'y, or any medi$a' do$tor, priest or minister $hosen by him or by any one from his immediate fami'y or by his $ounse', or be visited by?$onfer with du'y a$$redited nationa' or internationa' non7 government organi/ation" It sha'' be the responsibi'ity of the offi$er to ensure that this is a$$omp'ished. 4" -e must be informed that he has the right to waive any of said rights provided it is made vo'untari'y, knowing'y and inte''igent'y and ensure that he understood the same. @" In addition, if the person arrested waives his right to a 'awyer, he must be informed that it must be done in writing 6N) in the presen$e of $ounse', otherwise, he must be warned that the waiver is void even if he insist on his waiver and $hooses to speak. 9" #hat the person arrested must be informed that he may indi$ate in any manner at any time or stage of the pro$ess that he does not wish to be Auestioned with warning that on$e he makes su$h indi$ation, the po'i$e may 2

not interrogate him if the same had not yet $ommen$ed, or the interrogation must $eased if it has a'ready begun. 10" #he person arrested must be informed that his initia' waiver of his right to remain si'ent, the right to $ounse' or any of his rights does not bar him from invoking it at any time during the pro$ess, regard'ess of whether he may have answered some Auestions or vo'unteered some statements. 11" -e must a'so be informed that any statement or eviden$e, as the $ase may be, obtained in vio'ation of any of the foregoing, whether in$u'patory or e3$u'patory, in who'e or in part, sha'' be inadmissib'e in eviden$e"

You might also like