Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 11—November 2024
Research Letter

Prevalence of Pertactin-Deficient Bordetella pertussis Isolates, Slovenia

Author affiliation: National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis and Diphtheria, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland (A.-M. Barkoff, J. Mertsola, Q. He); InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Turku (A.-M. Barkoff, J. Mertsola, Q. He); National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food Department for Public Health Microbiology, Ljubljana, Slovenia (T. Kastrin); Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana (K. Seme); Communicable Diseases Centre, National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana (M. Grgič Vitek)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In Slovenia, primary acellular pertussis vaccines (ACVs) containing pertactin (PRN) were mostly used during 1999–2016; ACVs without PRN were introduced in 2017. Among 123 Bordetella pertussis strains collected during 2002–2020, a total of 48 were PRN-deficient; 44 were collected after 2017. Changes to ACVs could increase PRN-deficient B. pertussis and infections.

In Slovenia, whole-cell pertussis vaccine was introduced in 1959 and replaced by acellular pertussis vaccine (ACV) in 1999. ACVs containing pertactin (PRN), a highly immunogenic virulence factor of Bordetella pertussis, were used during 1999–2016, but since 2017, ACVs with and without PRN have been used, excluding during 2011, when only ACV without PRN was used. During 2006–2016, ACVs with and without PRN were used for primary immunization (Table). Since 2009, a booster vaccine including PRN has been given to children 8 years of age, and coverage for primary and booster vaccinations has been high (>90%).

A recent study from Japan showed a decreased frequency of PRN-deficient B. pertussis isolates after a change to an ACV without PRN (1). Similar observations have been made in Finland (Q. He et al., unpub. data), and partly in Spain (2). In Finland, primary vaccination using ACV without PRN was implemented in 2019, and all isolates collected during 2022–2023 were PRN-positive (Q. He et al., unpub. data). Previously, we have shown a high frequency of PRN-deficient B. pertussis isolates in Slovenia (3); such isolates could evade vaccine-induced immunity. We investigated how the compositional change in the current ACV has affected circulating B. pertussis strains.

We studied all 123 B. pertussis isolates collected during 2002–2020 in Slovenia, including 27 previously published isolates (3). Isolates were collected from different locations; 74 were collected during 2002–2016 and 49 during 2017–2020. Vaccination history was available for 45/49 (91.8%) patients reported during 2017–2020, among whom 31/45 (68.9%) were fully vaccinated. We used a standardized ELISA method with monoclonal antibodies to measure antigen expression of PRN, pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), and fimbriae (Fim) 2 and 3, as described previously (4). We used whole-genome sequencing of the prn gene to identify mechanisms causing PRN deficiency (5). For genotyping, we used PCR-based methods to identify allele specificity of prn, ptxP, and ptxA genes (6).

Figure

Number of PRN-deficient isolates and frequency of fimbrial serotypes in a study of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates, Slovenia, 2002–2020. Vaccines in yellow boxes are those used for primary vaccination; those in the white box are used for booster vaccination. ACV, acellular pertussis vaccine; ACV PRN, ACV containing pertactin; ACV ∆PRN, ACV without pertactin; Fim, fimbriae; PRN, pertactin.

Figure. Number of PRN-deficient isolates and frequency of fimbrial serotypes in a study of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussisisolates, Slovenia, 2002–2020. Vaccines in yellow boxes are those used for primary vaccination;...

Altogether, 48 (39.0%) isolates did not express PRN. All but 4 isolates collected during 2002–2016 (70/74 [94.6%]) expressed PRN, but 44/49 (91.8%) isolates collected during 2017–2020 did not (Figure). One isolate collected in 2020 did not produce PRN or FHA. All isolates produced PT, and all but 2 isolates produced FHA. Most (43/48 [89.6%]) PRN-deficient isolates carried the IS481 insertion within the prn gene at positions 1613 (n = 40) or 2735 (n = 3). Among the other 5 isolates, 2 had a 22-kb conversion in the promoter region of prn gene, 1 isolate had a large deletion of nucleotides within the prn promoter–gene area, and 2 others had single nucleotide deletions, 1 at ΔT 632 and 1 at ΔG 793. The mechanism behind FHA deficiencies remains unknown.

For serotypes, 53/123 (43.1%) isolates harbored Fim2, 69/123 (56.1%) Fim3, and 1/123 (0.8%) Fim2,3. From 2017 onward, 45/49 (91.8%) isolates harbored Fim2, and 66/74 (89.2%) isolates collected during 2002–2016 harbored Fim3 (Figure). Genotyping showed that 122/123 (99.2%) isolates carried ptxA1, and 120/123 (97.6%) carried ptxP3 alleles. For prn, prn2 was dominant 99/123 (80.5%), but prn6–8 alleles (23/123, 18.7%) were also notified among the PRN-deficient isolates with an IS481 insertion. For 1 strain, prn was untypable.

Prevalence of PRN-deficient B. pertussis isolates remains high in Slovenia, although the current primary vaccines do not contain PRN. That finding differs from findings in Spain, Japan, and Finland (1,2; Q. He et al., unpub. data), where decline in frequency of PRN-deficient isolates was observed after the change to an ACV without PRN. Although the current vaccination schedule in Slovenia is effective and has high coverage, a 2021 seroprevalence study indicated high circulation of pertussis (7), which might affect selection pressure on PRN from natural infection. In addition, since 2009, Slovenia has implemented an additional booster containing PRN in 8-year-old children, which has high vaccination coverage (>90%). That booster could affect the number of PRN-negative strains. In addition, the effect of the frequent changes in vaccines on selection pressure for PRN-deficient isolates cannot be excluded.

We also observed a change in serotype frequency from Fim3 to Fim2 during the study period (Figure). In Slovenia, most ACVs do not contain Fim. Therefore, the change from Fim3 to Fim2 among isolates is likely because of natural selection, which may bias population immunity toward the dominant serotype (8). Furthermore, Fim2 strains could express both Fim2 and Fim3 during infection, as described in antibody findings among persons infected by Fim2 B. pertussis strains (9). Our finding of increasing frequency of both B. pertussis PRN-deficiency and Fim2 strains aligns with findings from a study in Spain that suggest a possible link between the 2 characteristics (2), which may provide an advantage of the isolates to escape population immunity. Most isolates in this study carried the genotype ptxA1/prn2/ptxP3, which is common in countries using ACVs (6).

In conclusion, the unique evading mechanisms of B. pertussis against vaccine-induced immunity in Slovenia remain unclear. To maintain optimal vaccination programs to prevent pertussis, Slovenia should continue monitoring circulating B. pertussis isolates to inform possible implications for disease incidence and vaccination strategies.

Mr. Barkoff is a project researcher at the Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. His research interests include pertussis vaccine studies in different age groups, Bordetella pertussis molecular typing, and surveillance of pertussis in Europe.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Liisa Lund for the excellent laboratory work.

This study is partly supported by Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (grant no. 26006205), Sigrid Juselius Foundation (grant no. 240045), and EUpertstrain project (project nos. 26004877 and 26004878).

Top

References

  1. Hiramatsu  Y, Miyaji  Y, Otsuka  N, Arakawa  Y, Shibayama  K, Kamachi  K. Significant decrease in pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:699701. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mir-Cros  A, Moreno-Mingorance  A, Martín-Gómez  MT, Abad  R, Bloise  I, Campins  M, et al. Pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis with unusual mechanism of pertactin disruption, Spain, 1986–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:96776. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kastrin  T, Barkoff  AM, Paragi  M, Vitek  MG, Mertsola  J, He  Q. High prevalence of currently circulating Bordetella pertussis isolates not producing vaccine antigen pertactin in Slovenia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:25860. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkoff  AM, Guiso  N, Guillot  S, Xing  D, Markey  K, Berbers  G, et al. A rapid ELISA-based method for screening Bordetella pertussis strain production of antigens included in current acellular pertussis vaccines. J Immunol Methods. 2014;408:1428. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkoff  AM, Mertsola  J, Pierard  D, Dalby  T, Hoegh  SV, Guillot  S, et al. Pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates: evidence of increased circulation in Europe, 1998 to 2015. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1700832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkoff  AM, Mertsola  J, Pierard  D, Dalby  T, Hoegh  SV, Guillot  S, et al. Surveillance of circulating Bordetella pertussis strains in Europe during 1998 to 2015. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e0199817. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berbers  G, van Gageldonk  P, Kassteele  JV, Wiedermann  U, Desombere  I, Dalby  T, et al.; Serosurveillance Study Team. Circulation of pertussis and poor protection against diphtheria among middle-aged adults in 18 European countries. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2871. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hot  D, Antoine  R, Renauld-Mongénie  G, Caro  V, Hennuy  B, Levillain  E, et al. Differential modulation of Bordetella pertussis virulence genes as evidenced by DNA microarray analysis. Mol Genet Genomics. 2003;269:47586. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heikkinen  E, Xing  DK, Olander  RM, Hytönen  J, Viljanen  MK, Mertsola  J, et al. Bordetella pertussis isolates in Finland: serotype and fimbrial expression. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:162. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3011.231393

Original Publication Date: October 17, 2024

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 11—November 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Qiushui He, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, Turku 20520, Finland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 30, 2024
Page updated: October 23, 2024
Page reviewed: October 23, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external