Skip to content

Implement faster predict_y and generalised it to GPMC#2089

Draft
zhixiaozhu wants to merge 8 commits into
GPflow:developfrom
zhixiaozhu:faster_predict_y
Draft

Implement faster predict_y and generalised it to GPMC#2089
zhixiaozhu wants to merge 8 commits into
GPflow:developfrom
zhixiaozhu:faster_predict_y

Conversation

@zhixiaozhu

@zhixiaozhu zhixiaozhu commented Oct 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR type: bugfix / enhancement / new feature / doc improvement

Related issue(s)/PRs:

Summary

Proposed changes

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...

What alternatives have you considered?

Minimal working example

# Put your example code in here

Release notes

Fully backwards compatible: yes / no

If not, why is it worth breaking backwards compatibility:

PR checklist

  • New features: code is well-documented
    • detailed docstrings (API documentation)
    • notebook examples (usage demonstration)
  • The bug case / new feature is covered by unit tests
  • Code has type annotations
  • Build checks
    • I ran the black+isort formatter (make format)
    • I locally tested that the tests pass (make check-all)
  • Release management
    • RELEASE.md updated with entry for this change
    • New contributors: I've added myself to CONTRIBUTORS.md

@zhixiaozhu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @uri-granta, @jesnie, I was trying to put together this PR but the CI kept failing. Could you please kindly help me to have a look if this was an issue by my change or the dev branch? I tired to run CI on the dev branch and it seemed to have failed with the same error. Many thanks.

@uri-granta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry I missed your comment! There were some typing issues exposed by third party library updates that have now been fixed (see #2094). Hopefully merging the latest develop will fix your problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants