Chgans/allow preload injector override#543
Conversation
This allow to overwrite the LD_PRELOAD, which can be useful when ld.so is in secure-execution mode. See https://mail.kdab.com/pipermail/gammaray-interest/2019-March/000317.html
akreuzkamp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You reuse --injector-override which is used by the gdb and lldb injectors to override the gdb/lldb executable. I don't know a lot about injection in general, but I wonder if it would make sense for the gdb/lldb injectors too, to allow overriding the probe-dll path. In that case it wouldn't be a good idea to reuse that commandline option. I think it's better to add a new one --probe-dll-override. @vkrause what do you think?
| // and if so inject it before GammaRay | ||
| QStringList ldPreload; | ||
| foreach (const auto &lib, LibraryUtil::dependencies(exePath)) { | ||
| for (const auto &lib: LibraryUtil::dependencies(exePath)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please do
const QVector<QByteArray> libraryDependencies = LibraryUtil::dependencies(exePath);
for (const auto &lib: libraryDependencies) {
else using range-for will detach the vector.
| { | ||
| Q_UNUSED(probeFunc); | ||
|
|
||
| const QString actualProbeDll = m_probeDllOverride.isEmpty() ? probeDll : m_probeDllOverride; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This would be better preserved at the caller side of this function, i.e. in Launcher::start. That requires the use of a separated commandline option though.
|
I think you are right, separating the command line arguments affecting the probe from those affecting the injector makes sense. The approach in general is fine IMHO, as discussed by email already. |
|
Oops, forgot about this PR.... |
|
|
|
I have signed NDA ages ago, and I have already contributed to GammaRay |
|
When i follow the link, i get: |
|
yes, I'm sorry. I'm trying to use cla-assistant webhook to make things easier than "paper". still learning how to use it and I need to pre-approved those who already signed. |
This the PR for https://mail.kdab.com/pipermail/gammaray-interest/2019-March/000317.html.
It is untested so far, and i won't be able to test it before April. Nonetheless, you might want to comment on that.