Only allow name attribute for list representation of repositories #12588
Conversation
|
I think that's reasonable, @JoshuaBehrens, but I'll let @Seldaek confirm :) Thank you so much for the quick follow-up! One thing, though: if I understand all the test changes from #12388 correctly, you changed a bunch of the example fixtures that use the object/assoc There are a bunch of tests for the object/assoc notation for But the PR diffs are fairly large and I have lost my train of thought a few times trying to figure out if I am just missing the fact that it's already there, so please forgive me if it's an oversight on my part. |
Follow up to #12388 . It ensures, that the new and unreleased property name can only be used for the list representation to prevent ambiguous configurations.
@Seldaek @dzuelke I do not know if I am thinking to simple about it, but when the schema does not even allow it, it cannot go wrong anywhere. Neither IDE nor composer would work with it. And as it is about a new property, that is not yet released, we can introduce new rules around it.