The trial balloon floated by the Trump Department of Justice calling for the stripping of Second Amendment rights of transgender people was foolish.
There's an old poem that aptly applies here:
“First They Came” by Pastor Martin Niemöller. He was a German Lutheran pastor who initially supported Hitler but later opposed the Nazi regime and was imprisoned in concentration camps.
Here is the most well-known version of the poem:
**“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”**
The message is clear: when injustice is ignored because it doesn’t personally affect someone, it will eventually grow until it does.
This is certainly the case of the trial balloon. Who would be next if trans people got their Second Amendment rights stripped from them?
The Los Angeles Times reported:
Given the tsunami of news demanding your attention you might have missed an interesting trial balloon launched by the Department of Justice last week. Officials briefed reporters on preliminary discussions among the department’s top brass to ban transgender people from buying guns. This was in the wake of last month’s horrendous Minneapolis church shooting by a deranged killer who identified as trans and who murdered two children and injured at least 17 others.
The first outlet to report on the talks was the very Trump-friendly Daily Wire. The salient political issue, according to reporter Mary Margaret Olohan, was that, “The move would undoubtedly infuriate those on the left who believe that men can become women and women can become men — and that people who identify as transgender are not mentally ill but merely living in the wrong body.”
It’s certainly true that the trial balloon irked many on the left. GLAAD, the Human Rights Campaign and similar groups from the civil rights community were also appalled.
Among the bothered was a very different kind of civil rights group. The National Rifle Assn., which describes itself as America’s “longest-standing civil rights organization,” responded in a statement: “The NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms. NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process.”
I agree with the NRA. Fortunately, this hare-brained idea won't be going anywhere.
To read more, go here.