Review: 60452 Donut Truck

Posted by ,

Food trucks are relatively common in LEGO City and normally feature large food-based signs on the roof. 60452 Donut Truck is an ideal example and certainly looks interesting, given the colour scheme intended to resemble icing and its roof-mounted doughnut, of course!

These features look lovely and correspond with other LEGO food trucks, although I have also identified a few practical issues with the design, so this set warrants closer examination.

Summary

60452 Donut Truck, 196 pieces.
£17.99 / $19.99 / €19.99 | 9.2p/10.2c/10.2c per piece.
Buy at LEGO.com »

I have a few issues with 60452 Donut Truck, but it remains a fun set overall

  • Striking colour scheme and sign
  • Lots of printed pieces
  • Distinctive shape
  • Awkward proportions, in places
  • No serving counter doors
  • Fairly sparse interior

The set was provided for review by LEGO. All opinions expressed are those of the author.

Minifigures

The operator's apron is nicely decorated to match his truck, with a pink-frosted doughnut and distinctive dark azure icing pattern. This torso is new and the gloves are a realistic addition as well, since their colour matches those commonly worn by people preparing food.

Police officers are known for their stereotyped love of doughnuts and it appears that extends to LEGO City, with an officer visiting the truck! This minifigure uses a relatively rare torso, found in only two other sets and featuring some superb details, including the metallic silver plaque above her pocket.

In addition, the dark orange hair piece looks excellent and I like this double-sided head, so the officer can enjoy a post-doughnut nap. The banknote's denomination seems excessive though, particularly since prices are actually displayed on the truck, so maybe she is buying doughnuts for the whole police station!

The Completed Model

Food trucks in LEGO City normally follow a consistent format, distinguished primarily by colour and the aforementioned signage. This vehicle is similar in some ways, although its shape more closely resembles 40681 Retro Food Truck, so I welcome that change. Also, the dark azure and white colours are attractive, with medium nougat elements evoking a doughnut underneath.

2x2 curved corner slopes, introduced in several sets this month, provide effective shaping over the radiator, which comprises simple 1x2 grille tiles. I like the headlights attached on either side and the curvature of the front looks good overall, reminiscent of the Renault Estafette and some older Peugeot vans.

The model includes functional doors and a removable roof to access the cab. There is limited detail inside, but the essential steering wheel is present and a 2x2 plate with two studs serves as a basic seat for the driver.

The side of the truck with the serving window is clearly designed to be the focus, but the other side looks good as well, with a trans-clear window and dark azure grille tiles for texture. These provide a nice visual balance across the vehicle, while also allowing some more light inside.

Nonetheless, the right side is definitely the highlight. I love the white and flame yellow orange stripes on the awning and the printed menus were a pleasant surprise, as I expected stickers. Furthermore, the opening door and step at the back look excellent, very reminiscent of 60404 Burger Truck.

Similarly, the serving window on this vehicle is noticeably high, which was also a problem with the burger truck. I think this example is worse though because the counter is actually above a minifigure's head height, which looks rather awkward. On the other hand, the printed 2x6 tiles with icing patterns are brilliant, especially since the medium nougat printing matches the wheel arches.

The menus are appealing too, with matching icing patterns and appealing doughnut graphics. Unfortunately, there are no doors to close the serving window during travel, which is a shame because it almost seems as though the 2x3 tiles could slide along between the countertop and the awning.

Several more printed tiles are found on the doughnut sign, representing sprinkles. 3x3 quarter circle curved bricks are used to superb effect here and the splattered icing underneath is a fun detail too. However, there is a visible gap between the doughnut's tan and dark pink halves and the sign spins completely freely, which I find a bit irritating.

The roof can be detached easily, revealing plenty of room for a minifigure inside. However, the food preparation area leaves something to be desired. The coffee dispenser is a nice inclusion, but there is no fryer for the doughnuts, nor icing bags. The doughnuts themselves look splendid though and four of these printed tiles are provided, plus a spare.

Moreover, the doughnut stall can be removed and deployed on its own. This is another feature shared with 60404 Burger Truck and the option is welcome, but this instance is less successful than the burger truck, in my opinion. Personally, I think the stall looks too small alone.

Overall

Food trucks are often a highlight of the January range in LEGO City and 60452 Donut Truck is another enjoyable set, albeit not among my favourites. The colour scheme and wacky sign are both stunning, but this model lacks the sheer character of 60384 Penguin Slushy Van or 60404 Burger Truck, released in 2023 and 2024.

Also, I dislike the height of the serving window beside minifigures. The proportions do not need to be completely realistic, by any means, but this example looks silly. Despite some issues, this is still a worthwhile addition to LEGO City and I think the price of £17.99, $19.99 or €19.99 feels fair, particularly with so many exclusive printed pieces included.

56 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

It’s almost like it’s too tall in the truck and too short on its own. But this review has probably pushed this back into the “probably get” column. Thanks, Cap.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I think the food truck series is an excellent feature of the City lineup, but this one doesn’t work for me. The overall design feels bland and poorly-thought out. Good idea, but rather lacking in execution.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Paying with a 100 moneybill (what is the name of legomoney??) will buy her a lot of doni (plural for donut).
The donut truck looks a bit like a 80s lego car/truck but blown up.
I do like the printed tiles

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm not a fan of the detachable stalls, but at least the burger trunk one looked like a burger so had that fun quality to it.

the height doesn't bother me, I've seen plenty of real food trucks that have that issue, but the height wouldn't have been an issue if the stall wasn't detachable. So the unnecessary feature makes the overall a little worse.

I hope they remove that from next year's food truck.

Overall, this was a 'must get' and is still a 'must get' so it can go with the other food trucks

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I donut intend to buy this
;-)

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

With all these food trucks serving junk food, I'm surprised Lego folk stay so slim!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Honestly the "unrealistically" high shelf reminds me of some real food trucks I've tried to buy from.

@Brickodillo said:
"Paying with a 100 moneybill (what is the name of legomoney??) will buy her a lot of doni (plural for donut)."

Donodes.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

Agree with the proportions being odd. Just built it the other day and it kind of looks too narrow in the rear section. A bit more interior detail would have been nice indeed. A fridge, a frying bath, jars with sprinkles, a coating pan with the pink sugar goo... So much they could have done.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

The number of printed pieces in a 20€ set leaves every Star Wars or Marvel collector in shock and awe.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Brickodillo said:
"Paying with a 100 moneybill (what is the name of legomoney??) will buy her a lot of doni (plural for donut)."

Maybe she is not paying for the donut with the hundred dollar bill, but is instead receiving a bribe from the donut vendor!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Homer's dream car

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Does this remind anyone else of the Doughnut Truck from Simpsons: Hit and Run?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Compared to the best Lego food trucks like 60150 and 60253 this just looks very junior.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I will have no truck with this abomination Sir

Gravatar
By in United States,

Maybe it's a silly thing, but I don't like that the hole doens't actually go through the donut. I'll still probably grab it, though--definitely have a donut fan or two in our family!

I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model).

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

It looks very budget conscious and I think the doughnut could have been placed better, maybe at an angle?

Preferred 40681.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before.

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

Very cute. The City Food trucks sets in recent years have been quite good.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I can't figure out if the donut with a face at the rear of the truck is happy or in excruciating pain due to the bite taken from them.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Is that good printing on a dark piece? Dang, not too common these days (at least in eagle land).

Also, I don't find the height difference to be a problem. These were always elevated, and as a (younger) kid I had to reach up for stuff, and even now most of my body is still below the counter, so I'd call it fairly appropriate.

Gravatar
By in Brazil,

I checked the instructions (and the overall build of the set) and noticed it uses the awful layout of the 4+ sets, with the big hands and one or two parts per step, plus the vehicle has a pretty simplified build. Same applies for the ambulance and the red car. Feels like Lego is trying to introduce some sort of middle ground between the normal and 4+ sets.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@DoonsterBuildsLego said:
" @Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops. "


@yamaki said:
"The number of printed pieces in a 20€ set leaves every Star Wars or Marvel collector in shock and awe."

Lego considers stickers and normal instructions too advanced for 5 year olds now. 5+ is now essentially 4+ but without the specialised juniors parts.

The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?

Gravatar
By in Puerto Rico,

Cue an army of Homer Simpson....

Gravatar
By in United States,

@DoonsterBuildsLego said:
" @Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops. "


I don't have any 4+ sets, so I didn't know what you guys were talking about with the giant hands. What a monumental waste of instructions pages. I thoroughly hate it. But I still want this set.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @DoonsterBuildsLego said:
" @Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops. "


@yamaki said:
"The number of printed pieces in a 20€ set leaves every Star Wars or Marvel collector in shock and awe."

Lego considers stickers and normal instructions too advanced for 5 year olds now. 5+ is now essentially 4+ but without the specialised juniors parts.

The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?"

Call me elitist or exclusionist, but I thoroughly believe that if five year old kids are too stupid to realize on their own that LEGO pieces are supposed to be used with the hands, then LEGO definitely is the wrong toy for them!

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Quite like the bus, though I would probably mod it into a closed van, no donuts for me.

Oh, and for a donut truck, I spot a severe lack of Swedish Chef and a gun....

About those instructions.....just wait for these to be the norm for all sets. Not everyone can handle the regular instructions, and I've been told repeatedly that any criticism against that is ableist.

Gravatar
By in Switzerland,

@AustinPowers said:
" @Nuclearxpotato said:
" @DoonsterBuildsLego said:
" @Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops. "


@yamaki said:
"The number of printed pieces in a 20€ set leaves every Star Wars or Marvel collector in shock and awe."

Lego considers stickers and normal instructions too advanced for 5 year olds now. 5+ is now essentially 4+ but without the specialised juniors parts.

The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?"

Call me elitist or exclusionist, but I thoroughly believe that if five year old kids are too stupid to realize on their own that LEGO pieces are supposed to be used with the hands, then LEGO definitely is the wrong toy for them!"


I would not call you elitist or exclusionist. I would just call you plain arrogant.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Thanks for the review.

I have another take on the detachable backs of this and the burger truck. This year’s ambulance has it as welll. For kids with more than one of these sets, the back sections can be swapped between trucks as an extra play feature. So, burger truck ambulance for example.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Mylenium said:
"Agree with the proportions being odd. Just built it the other day and it kind of looks too narrow in the rear section. A bit more interior detail would have been nice indeed. A fridge, a frying bath, jars with sprinkles, a coating pan with the pink sugar goo... So much they could have done."

Yes, I agree with you and the Cap'n who also wanted icing bags. However, such bags are used more often with cakes and other patisserie than doughnuts. Donuts are usually drenched, dipped, or spattered- especially the examples depicted.

Regardless, we definitely needed some doughnut-making prep space. Otherwise, it's just selling old holes to unsuspecting souls.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Also about the instructions, you gotta love that they still include a page about sustainable packaging, yet make the instructions literally twice as long as they need to be....

I do wonder now if this set (or even more the ones actually in shops, not provided for review by Lego) had paper or plastic bags....

Gravatar
By in United States,

I echo those who have patronized food trucks with the windows above my head. And I'm not really short @ 5'6". I'll probably get this once it gets a price reduction.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

the set was great, the thing that annoyed me about this set was the instructions. They seemed to be treating me like a 5-year old. First off they said to try the app, then was laid out like the app. The book(s) were twice as long as really necessary.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Im just a bit surprised at all the specific printed tiles for this set. Pleasantly surprised, if they appear on sale at Amazon I may pick one up.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I love collecting the food truck series. :D

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

Great set, so far i have 3. One built up, one saved away and one being tuned into a Noodle Food Truck. As for the comments on instructions, remember it is a set for 5 year olds.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Definately a nice upgrade from 41723 Donut Shop (which still has the nice printed disc and donut pices + the green vespa is unique to that set)

And it doesn't come with a whole lot of other stuff like 60233 Donut Shop Opening

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


That must be it then, I don't think I've gotten a modern 4+ set before. I guess I'm just old--back in my day, we didn't have numbered bags, or call-out boxes telling us which parts we needed for a step, and there were 12 steps on a page, and 30 pieces per step, and the pages were hand-drafted without CAD, up hill both ways in the snow..

Seriously, though, I still don't use the call-outs and just build by what I see changed since the previous step. And yes, often enough, this does cause me to miss a piece or two.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@MrBedhead said:
" @AustinPowers said:
" @Nuclearxpotato said:
" @DoonsterBuildsLego said:
" @Ryangaff said:
" @ra226 said:
"I just had a look at the instructions to verify the donut hole... and is this a new trend in instrucions? There's an entire page devoted to hands holding the parts you'll need for the step (instead of the usual little box on the same page as the model)."

It's common in 4+ sets, but I don't think I've seen it in a 'regular' set before."


This is a 5+ set. I've definitely seen this style of instructions for the younger age ranges, just couldn't say exactly how old it stops. "


@yamaki said:
"The number of printed pieces in a 20€ set leaves every Star Wars or Marvel collector in shock and awe."

Lego considers stickers and normal instructions too advanced for 5 year olds now. 5+ is now essentially 4+ but without the specialised juniors parts.

The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?"

Call me elitist or exclusionist, but I thoroughly believe that if five year old kids are too stupid to realize on their own that LEGO pieces are supposed to be used with the hands, then LEGO definitely is the wrong toy for them!"


I would not call you elitist or exclusionist. I would just call you plain arrogant."

Ok then, explain to us then why any kid would need such extremely obnoxious instructions that imply that they're incompetent imbeciles.

For crying out loud, it's perfectly fine to show the pieces in the hands on the first page. But on every friggin second page? Don't even you think that's a bit much?
Never again should TLG pretend they care about the environment when by that type of instruction alone they double the amount of paper necessary.

How on Earth were kids in the past before these kinds of instructions able to build sets at all? It's a wonder they didn't electrocute themselves with their 12V or 9V trains sets, strangle themselves with the wires from pirate ships or die from eating magnets or any other type of piece instead of putting them in their hands and building with them.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@AustinPowers said:
"
How on Earth were kids in the past before these kinds of instructions able to build sets at all? It's a wonder they didn't electrocute themselves with their 12V or 9V trains sets, strangle themselves with the wires from pirate ships or die from eating magnets or any other type of piece instead of putting them in their hands and building with them."


Children LITERALLY ate magnets and they would connect through their internal organs, it was a huge safety regulation fiasco. Electric model train sets use voltage that far below dangerous levels, even for a child. Children will attempt to put many toys in their mouth because they're curious, sometimes swallowing because they simply don't know the consequences.
Toy regulations are written because of (sometimes narrowly-avoided) tragedy.

Lego does a bunch of internal playtesting we are not privy to, we can only assume there's reasoning behind the decision to make the instructions for this age bracket as large and obnoxious as possible. As a game developer I can tell you that adults have problems acknowledging pop-ups and tutorial text if it isn't beyond obvious and in the center of their vision.

Gravatar
By in Poland,

@Nuclearxpotato said:

"The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?"

That implication is only your personal feeling. In reality Lego, as every other successful company does everything possible to attract as many fans as possible. Let's assume 90% of kids do just fine with old style instructions, that still leaves 10% of potential long term fans that need a lil bit more to feel included. In reality the proportions are less favorable for your idea of kids eyesight. The instructions are not dumbed down because lego thinks ALL kids are dumb. Lego sees that SOME kids need extra push, while the others who don't will do just fine with easier instructions. The survivor bias is very strong in afol community and it becomes annoying to read about it in every comment section.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @AustinPowers said:
"
How on Earth were kids in the past before these kinds of instructions able to build sets at all? It's a wonder they didn't electrocute themselves with their 12V or 9V trains sets, strangle themselves with the wires from pirate ships or die from eating magnets or any other type of piece instead of putting them in their hands and building with them."


Children LITERALLY ate magnets and they would connect through their internal organs, it was a huge safety regulation fiasco. Electric model train sets use voltage that far below dangerous levels, even for a child. Children will attempt to put many toys in their mouth because they're curious, sometimes swallowing because they simply don't know the consequences.
Toy regulations are written because of (sometimes narrowly-avoided) tragedy."

Firstly, where was parental supervision in these cases? Yeah, let your toddler play unsupervised with toys that are not intended for its age group. Always a great idea.

Secondly, if kids in the appropriate age group still think it's a good idea to eat magnets, I honestly question their sanity. It's like with the reason Kinder Surprise Eggs are banned in the US. How on Earth anyone can think it's a good idea to swallow a chocolate egg the sole purpose of which is to get you a toy inside is beyond me.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Why do none of the new vehicles have licence plates? I only now realized that both this set and the formula 1 truck dont have them. It makes especially this donut truck look even more bland

Gravatar
By in United States,

@thor96 said:
" @Nuclearxpotato said:

"The change in instructions is especially baffling to me because it implies children of that age have terrible eyesight by making everything massive. I understand limiting pieces per step and displaying parts individually (showing four identical elements instead of showing one with a "x4" next to it) like they did last year... but does it really need that page-doubling hands image?"

That implication is only your personal feeling. In reality Lego, as every other successful company does everything possible to attract as many fans as possible. Let's assume 90% of kids do just fine with old style instructions, that still leaves 10% of potential long term fans that need a lil bit more to feel included. In reality the proportions are less favorable for your idea of kids eyesight. The instructions are not dumbed down because lego thinks ALL kids are dumb. Lego sees that SOME kids need extra push, while the others who don't will do just fine with easier instructions. The survivor bias is very strong in afol community and it becomes annoying to read about it in every comment section.

"


I completely agree, and I also kinda assumed that was the case as well; Lego does so much internal playtesting that clearly they have a reason to do this and some data / experiences to back it up. At the end of the day I don't really mind, it's just odd to see the 5+ age bracket get the full Juniors treatment (but it IS just a year older so it's not really that odd I suppose lol). It still feels a bit wasteful with the paper used, you'd assume there's a more economic solution... but at least it's the easily recyclable part.

Survivor bias and rose-tinted glasses are definitely REALLY strong in these comment sections (especially among certain members), and can be one of the more frustrating recurring comments.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

I think I start selling T-shirts saying "I survived the 80s - When every toy tried to kill you!"

Just hoping enough 80s kid actually survived to buy one....

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Fan_Of_Bricks said:
" @gunther_schnitzel said:
" @AustinPowers said:
"I donut intend to buy this
;-) "


I donut intend to pass on this set."


Me eater."


I'm going to sprinkle this comment section with some more puns. I hope no one's eyes glaze over upon seeing them...

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

It's pretty cool. I like the door at the back. And we kind of get a workaround for the absolute dearth of buildings and heavy, heavy bias to vehicles in City with the easy option to just use part of the vehicle as a building. And you can use the vehicle to haul around other stuff.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@TheOtherMike said:
" I'm going to sprinkle this comment section with some more puns. I hope no one's eyes glaze over upon seeing them..."

Donut puns? That's a new twist! I can't fritter away this opportunity--puns may be old-fashioned, but I still say they're highest form of humor, bar none!

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

@CapnRex101 wrote in his review:
"Nonetheless, the right side is definitely the highlight."

Shouldn't that be the left side of the truck? (In regard to your review?)

P.S. Chocolate glazed donuts are advertised on the truck, but I don't see any printed chocolate donut 1x1 round tiles... I guess they were all eaten by Lego employees before the sets got factory packed? (I know, lame joke, not funny.) But seriously, does it only come with pink donut tiles?

All in all IMO it's a decent CITY food truck. Not very good, but not bad either.
Will wait for a discount.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@BaconKing said:
"Homer's dream car"

Watch out for Lard Lad!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@ra226 said:
" @TheOtherMike said:
" I'm going to sprinkle this comment section with some more puns. I hope no one's eyes glaze over upon seeing them..."

Donut puns? That's a new twist! I can't fritter away this opportunity--puns may be old-fashioned, but I still say they're highest form of humor, bar none!"


Indeed, I would say that puns are hole-y.

Gravatar
By in Croatia,

Like the old type of van and big doors and will transform it to 8-wide.
They should make side window to open sliding menus left and right, that would be cool

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I like that the booth can detach just like the Burger Truck from last year, although certain design choices make the build feel incomplete - I'm not too keen on the plain studs-on-op roof, and I feel the spaces beneath the front headlights could have had another light piece or coloured tile added rather than leaving it an empty stud.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@WizardOfOss said:
"Quite like the bus, though I would probably mod it into a closed van, no donuts for me.

Oh, and for a donut truck, I spot a severe lack of Swedish Chef and a gun....

About those instructions.....just wait for these to be the norm for all sets. Not everyone can handle the regular instructions, and I've been told repeatedly that any criticism against that is ableist."


Ok now that is ridiculous. That's a waste of paper and a waste of time to have to flip past that page. If the set is for people over the age of seven, they know to build a Lego set with their hands.

Return to home page »