Skip to content

Split extract metrics for Colabfold#552

Draft
jscgh wants to merge 33 commits into
nf-core:hackathon_march_2026from
Australian-Structural-Biology-Computing:split-extract_metrics-colabfold
Draft

Split extract metrics for Colabfold#552
jscgh wants to merge 33 commits into
nf-core:hackathon_march_2026from
Australian-Structural-Biology-Computing:split-extract_metrics-colabfold

Conversation

@jscgh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jscgh jscgh commented Mar 13, 2026

Splits extract metrics from Colabfold module.
Closes #545

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.

@jscgh jscgh self-assigned this Mar 13, 2026
@jscgh jscgh added the enhancement Improvement for existing functionality label Mar 13, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Mar 13, 2026

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 0f72a67

+| ✅ 341 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   4 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗  32 tests had warnings |!
Details

❗ Test warnings:

  • files_exist - File not found: conf/igenomes.config
  • files_exist - File not found: conf/igenomes_ignored.config
  • nextflow_config - Config manifest.version should end in dev: 2.0.0
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in methods_description_template.yml: #Update the HTML below to your preferred methods description, e.g. add publication citation for this pipeline
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in nextflow.config: Specify any additional parameters here
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in usage.md: Add documentation about anything specific to running your pipeline. For general topics, please point to (and add to) the main nf-core website.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_uniref30_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_bfd_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_pdb100_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_weights_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rfam_full_region_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rfam_cm_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rnacentral_rfam_annotations_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rnacentral_id_mapping_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rnacentral_sequences_link
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_uniref30_path
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_bfd_path
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_pdb100_path
  • schema_description - No description provided in schema for parameter: rosettafold2na_weights_path
  • local_component_structure - prepare_esmfold_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_helixfold3_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_alphafold3_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_rosettafold2na_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_alphafold2_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - post_processing.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - aria2_uncompress.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_rosettafold_all_atom_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_boltz_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_colabfold_dbs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 3.5.1
  • Run at 2026-03-18 05:37:47

@jscgh jscgh marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2026 04:04
@JoseEspinosa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry I think I introduced the conflicts and have not access to this branch to fix them 😢

@jscgh jscgh requested a review from JoseEspinosa March 14, 2026 03:00
@jscgh jscgh force-pushed the split-extract_metrics-colabfold branch from b83229b to 4957381 Compare March 14, 2026 03:09
@jscgh jscgh linked an issue Mar 14, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@jscgh jscgh moved this to Ready for review in Hackathon March 2026 Mar 14, 2026
@jscgh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jscgh commented Mar 14, 2026

Sorry I think I introduced the conflicts and have not access to this branch to fix them 😢

Whoops, didn't mean to push this to the other repo. I've rebased the branch and given you permissions to write in case it diverges again.

@jscgh jscgh marked this pull request as draft March 16, 2026 11:17
@JoseEspinosa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can't still fix the conflicts, sorry 😢

@jscgh jscgh force-pushed the split-extract_metrics-colabfold branch from 4957381 to 80bbfc1 Compare March 18, 2026 05:18
@jscgh jscgh marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2026 05:53
@jscgh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jscgh commented Mar 18, 2026

I can't still fix the conflicts, sorry 😢

I had to import the updated test configs and update snapshots. Everything looks green now.

@jscgh jscgh force-pushed the hackathon_march_2026 branch from 484b1b8 to 2057b9d Compare April 16, 2026 06:08
@jscgh jscgh marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2026 23:58
@jscgh jscgh added WIP Work in progress and removed Ready for review labels Apr 16, 2026
@jscgh jscgh added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Apr 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement Improvement for existing functionality WIP Work in progress

Projects

Status: Ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Split EXTRACT_METRICS for ColabFold

4 participants