Documentation restructure#890
Conversation
- Updated lmax description to reflect inclusion of amp2response. - Revised description of fixel format. - Renamed labelconvert tutorial to reduce conflict with structural connectome construction tutorial.
Done; have a look. You didn't actually state anywhere that the indices for all fixels within a voxel must be / are inferred to be sequential. :-P Still concerned that this is not sufficiently compatible with models generated through bootstrapping (and therefore FMRIB will reject the idea). For instance:
I've been telling people to not cite the 2012 paper and just give the website / GitHub. For the analyses most people are doing, none of it will actually be described in that paper; the only thing in common is the name. Yes it means less citations for Donald, but that's just how I feel about it.
Done. Edit: Has the ISMRM HCP connectome tutorial disappeared? |
- Command-line usage: Re-arrange order of entries, with simpler & more frequently-used features nearer the top; examples for ordering of options on command-line; more cases where command-line ordering does matter. - Image data: Separate fixel formats (new and legacy) from generic image formats, and slightly rename titles accordingly. - Hanging or crashing: More detail on inadequate RAM error, extend to apply to fixelcfestats; add section on inadequate storage for Python scripts. - Various tweaks.
Thanks, looks good
I guess they could have 1 file per bootstrap...bit silly I know. I guess not all packages/applications have to take this format on board. Personally I'm not going to have any time to drive this as a standard (I start my new job in 2.5 weeks). So I guess it's up to everyone else to decide on if they want to push it to be standardised and written up.
Clearly this format won't work for "All DWI models". Think I'll rename it to "fixel-based DWI models".
No, I just forgot to add the .rst extension when I renamed it. It's back now. |
|
@jdtournier I'm assuming you are happy with the restructure? Will merge it into tag_0.3.16 if so |
jdtournier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, no problem with the documentation at all. There's still a few things missing, but the structure looks good. Missing bits include a page on the humble single-shell CSD, which is notably absent from the CSD section (could also discuss the soft vs hard constraint issue) and simple targeted tractography, TDI, tract-wise measues of e.g. FA, etc (i.e. not quantitative connectivity - probably requires its own section) - mustn't forget that this probably makes up the bulk of our regular users...
thijsdhollander
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All good! There's indeed some gaps to fill still, but the structure is good and allows for it nicely. 👍
Hi Guys,
Check out the new documentation on the 'doc_restructure' branch on read the docs.
Some things to note: