✅ Auto-approved: docs-only change.

1 issue found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

• This PR appears low risk and safe to merge: the only reported issue is a documentation typo in docs/api-integrations/google-shared/google-security-review.mdx with very low severity (1/10).
• The issue is wording-only (“Not that” vs “Note that”) and does not indicate functional, runtime, or regression impact.
• Pay close attention to docs/api-integrations/google-shared/google-security-review.mdx - correct the typo so the sentence clearly warns that the email goes to the contact address.

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="docs/api-integrations/google-shared/google-security-review.mdx">

<violation number="1" location="docs/api-integrations/google-shared/google-security-review.mdx:363">
P3: Typo: 'Not that' should be 'Note that'. The sentence intends to tell the reader to be aware that the email goes to the contact address, not to negate something.</violation>
</file>

_{Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic}

✅ Auto-approved: docs-only change.

Left some comments for smaller changes, then good to go!

Overall we should show that with this guide & proper prep, passing the review process is not a big deal and something that can be done in a reasonable amount of time, even as an early stage startup.

✅ Auto-approved: docs-only change.

✅ Auto-approved: docs-only change.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 46fc26811d