Skip to content

Updated the APS shutter status PV. #1142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
prjemian merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2025
Merged

Updated the APS shutter status PV. #1142

prjemian merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2025

Conversation

@canismarko
Copy link
Collaborator

@canismarko canismarko commented Nov 24, 2025

The current PV used to check the global shutter permit status is an internal PV not meant to be used by beamlines. This PR replaces the internal PV with the public-facing version.

Tested at 25-ID to make sure it can connect and read properly:

>>> from apstools.devices import ApsMachineParametersDevice
>>> aps = ApsMachineParametersDevice(name="aps")
>>> aps.wait_for_connection()
>>> aps.read()
>>> aps.shutter_status.read()
{'aps_shutter_status': {'value': 'PERMIT', 'timestamp': 631152000.0}}
>>> aps.shutter_status.describe()
{'aps_shutter_status': {'source': 'PV:XFD:ShutterPermit', 'dtype': 'string', 'shape': [], 'units': None, 'lower_ctrl_limit': None, 'upper_ctrl_limit': None, 'enum_strs': ('NO PERMIT', 'PERMIT')}}

prjemian
prjemian approved these changes Nov 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@prjemian prjemian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks great.

@prjemian prjemian merged commit 0b1825d into BCDA-APS:main Nov 25, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@prjemian prjemian prjemian approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@canismarko @prjemian