Skip to content

Conversation

@colin-ho
Copy link
Collaborator

@colin-ho colin-ho commented Nov 18, 2025

Changes Made

Bye bye

Related Issues

Checklist

  • Documented in API Docs (if applicable)
  • Documented in User Guide (if applicable)
  • If adding a new documentation page, doc is added to docs/mkdocs.yml navigation
  • Documentation builds and is formatted properly

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Nov 18, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 70.30%. Comparing base (9eea183) to head (6a5bb0f).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
daft/dataframe/dataframe.py 28.57% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/daft-functions/src/numeric/sign.rs 84.61% 2 Missing ⚠️
daft/__init__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5619      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.27%   70.30%   +1.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1020     1021       +1     
  Lines      133235   131144    -2091     
==========================================
- Hits        92294    92198      -96     
+ Misses      40941    38946    -1995     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
daft/context.py 89.04% <ø> (ø)
daft/expressions/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
daft/expressions/expressions.py 95.80% <ø> (-1.15%) ⬇️
daft/functions/ai/__init__.py 15.90% <100.00%> (ø)
daft/functions/columnar.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
daft/functions/list.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
daft/functions/numeric.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
daft/functions/url.py 87.87% <ø> (ø)
daft/io/iceberg/iceberg_write.py 40.80% <100.00%> (ø)
daft/series.py 91.37% <100.00%> (-1.17%) ⬇️
... and 6 more

... and 37 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@colin-ho colin-ho marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2025 15:43
@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Skipped: This PR changes more files than the configured file change limit: (158 files found, 100 file limit)

@colin-ho colin-ho requested a review from kevinzwang November 21, 2025 23:50
Copy link
Member

@kevinzwang kevinzwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful. One more place where we use the deprecated expressions is in the examples on the daft.ai homepage. Just make sure to change those too before we release!

@colin-ho
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Beautiful. One more place where we use the deprecated expressions is in the examples on the daft.ai homepage. Just make sure to change those too before we release!

I'll make a ticket!

@colin-ho colin-ho enabled auto-merge (squash) November 26, 2025 01:37
@colin-ho colin-ho merged commit f76e65a into main Nov 26, 2025
39 checks passed
@colin-ho colin-ho deleted the colin/remove-expression-namespaces branch November 26, 2025 01:40
ykdojo added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
The `.dt` namespace was removed in #5619. Update the property-based
test to call `.year()` directly on the expression instead of `.dt.year()`.
colin-ho pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
## Summary

Fixes the nightly property-based test failure:
https://github.com/Eventual-Inc/Daft/actions/runs/19835912383

The `.dt` namespace on `Expression` was removed in #5619. This updates
the property-based test to call `.year()` directly on the expression
instead of `.dt.year()`.

## Test plan

- [x] Verified test fails before fix
- [x] Verified test passes after fix with 1000 examples
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants