Skip to content

add tags to failing tests#597

Merged
Sheeproid merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
tag-failing-test
Jul 7, 2025
Merged

add tags to failing tests#597
Sheeproid merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
tag-failing-test

Conversation

@Sheeproid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This change expands test categorization by introducing new tags in both the codebase and test metadata. Four additional pytest markers and evaluation tags are defined, and multiple test case YAML files are updated to include relevant tags under a new or existing tags field for improved test organization and filtering.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
pyproject.toml Added four new pytest markers: misleading-history, k8s-misconfig, chain-of-causation, and slackbot with descriptions.
tests/llm/utils/constants.py Expanded ALLOWED_EVAL_TAGS to include the four new tags, each with descriptive comments.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists/test_case.yaml
Added tags field with value ["logs"].
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml Added tags field with values ["misleading-history", "k8s-misconfig"].
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml Added tags field with value ["chain-of-causation"].
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml Added tags field with values ["chain-of-causation", "k8s-misconfig"].
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml Added tags field with values ["slackbot", "misleading-history"].
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools/test_case.yaml
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml
Added tags field with values ["network", "runbooks"].

Suggested reviewers

  • aantn
  • arikalon1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d64fd42c69a2e941bca9e39ccd7a5531015263d and f043d18.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/utils/constants.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools/test_case.yaml
  • tests/llm/utils/constants.py
  • pyproject.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: llm_evals
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Sheeproid Sheeproid requested a review from moshemorad July 6, 2025 16:15
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

19-21: kubectl apply -f./manifest.yaml will fail – missing space

kubectl treats -f as a flag whose value must be provided after a space (or with =). Without the space, it is parsed as an unknown shorthand flag and the test will error out.

-  kubectl apply -f./manifest.yaml
+  kubectl apply -f ./manifest.yaml

Same fix is needed for the corresponding kubectl delete line.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

6-9: Missing space after -f flag

Same kubectl apply/delete -f./manifest.yaml issue as in the sister file.

♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Duplicate feedback: see the earlier comment about network vs networking marker ambiguity.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Duplicate feedback: see the earlier comment about network vs networking marker ambiguity.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Duplicate feedback: see the earlier comment about network vs networking marker ambiguity.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Same taxonomy collision as above

Ensure only one of network / networking survives in the constants file and in all test cases.

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml (1)

18-20: Minor typo in comment

CurrenltyCurrently.

-# Currenlty holmes is able to answer the question correctly only around 10% of the time.
+# Currently Holmes is able to answer the question correctly only around 10 % of the time.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Potential confusion between network vs networking tags

network is already an established marker across the suite, and now we introduce networking.
Unless the two convey distinct semantics, having both will fragment filtering (pytest -m network vs pytest -m networking) and make dashboards harder to search.

If the intent is simply to rename/clarify the old marker, consider:

-  - networking
+  - network

and then deprecate networking from pyproject.toml.
Otherwise, document the precise difference in CONTRIBUTING.md and ensure every test uses the right one.

pyproject.toml (1)

83-87: Minor ordering nit

For readability the marker list has so far been alphabetical.
Keeping that convention helps future reviewers spot duplicates quickly.

-    "networking: Tests involving networking functionality",
-    "misleading-history: Tests with misleading historical data",
-    "k8s-misconfig: Tests involving Kubernetes misconfigurations",
-    "chain-of-causation: Tests involving chain-of-causation analysis",
-    "slackbot: Tests involving Slack bot functionality",
+    "chain-of-causation: Tests involving chain-of-causation analysis",
+    "k8s-misconfig: Tests involving Kubernetes misconfigurations",
+    "misleading-history: Tests with misleading historical data",
+    "networking: Tests involving networking functionality",
+    "slackbot: Tests involving Slack bot functionality",
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1)

5-17: Block scalar starts with an empty line – unintended leading newline

expected_output: | is immediately followed by a blank line, which introduces a leading newline into the value. If the evaluation logic performs exact or trimmed comparisons, this may cause false negatives. Delete the empty line or switch to |- to strip.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between baedc3b and 9d64fd42c69a2e941bca9e39ccd7a5531015263d.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/utils/constants.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml (2)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
Learnt from: nherment
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#408
File: holmes/plugins/toolsets/kubernetes_logs.py:90-97
Timestamp: 2025-05-15T05:13:43.169Z
Learning: In the Kubernetes logs toolset for Holmes, both current and previous logs are intentionally fetched and combined for each pod, even though this requires more API calls. This design ensures all logs are captured even when pods restart but retain their name, providing complete diagnostic information.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools/test_case.yaml (1)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml (1)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml (1)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_old_tools/test_case.yaml (1)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
tests/llm/utils/constants.py (1)
Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: robusta-dev/holmesgpt#586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: llm_evals
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Tags field looks correct and consistent with new taxonomy

YAML syntax, indentation, and values all comply with the updated ALLOWED_EVAL_TAGS. No further action required.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists/test_case.yaml (1)

2-3: Tag addition is valid

The new logs tag matches the updated constants; formatting is fine.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/44_slack_statefulset_logs/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Tagging change accepted

Both slackbot and misleading-history are recognized tags, and YAML formatting is sound.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/21_job_fail_curl_no_svc_account/test_case.yaml (1)

2-4: Tags correctly added

misleading-history and k8s-misconfig are now part of the allowed set; indentation is consistent.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1)

4-5: Tag addition acknowledged

chain-of-causation tag is valid; YAML is well-formed.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/08_sock_shop_frontend/test_case.yaml (1)

2-3: Tag already covered

logs already exists in ALLOWED_EVAL_TAGS; no issues here. ✅

Comment thread pyproject.toml Outdated
Comment thread tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools/test_case.yaml Outdated
Comment thread tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_all_tools/test_case.yaml Outdated
Comment thread tests/llm/utils/constants.py Outdated
@Sheeproid Sheeproid enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2025 06:28
@Sheeproid Sheeproid disabled auto-merge July 7, 2025 06:29
@Sheeproid Sheeproid enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2025 06:29
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Results of HolmesGPT evals

Test suite Test case Status
ask_holmes 01_how_many_pods ⚠️
ask_holmes 02_what_is_wrong_with_pod
ask_holmes 03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward
ask_holmes 04_related_k8s_events
ask_holmes 05_image_version
ask_holmes 06_explain_issue
ask_holmes 07_high_latency
ask_holmes 08_sock_shop_frontend ⚠️
ask_holmes 09_crashpod
ask_holmes 10_image_pull_backoff
ask_holmes 11_init_containers
ask_holmes 12_job_crashing
ask_holmes 13_pending_node_selector
ask_holmes 14_pending_resources
ask_holmes 15_failed_readiness_probe
ask_holmes 16_failed_no_toolset_found
ask_holmes 17_oom_kill
ask_holmes 18_crash_looping_v2
ask_holmes 19_detect_missing_app_details
ask_holmes 20_long_log_file_search
ask_holmes 22_high_latency_dbi_down ⚠️
ask_holmes 23_app_error_in_current_logs
ask_holmes 24_misconfigured_pvc
ask_holmes 25_misconfigured_ingress_class ⚠️
ask_holmes 26_multi_container_logs ⚠️
ask_holmes 27_permissions_error_no_helm_tools
ask_holmes 28_permissions_error_helm_tools_enabled
ask_holmes 29_events_from_alert_manager
ask_holmes 30_basic_promql_graph_cluster_memory
ask_holmes 31_basic_promql_graph_pod_memory
ask_holmes 32_basic_promql_graph_pod_cpu
ask_holmes 33_http_latency_graph
ask_holmes 34_memory_graph
ask_holmes 35_tempo
ask_holmes 36_argocd_find_resource
ask_holmes 37_argocd_wrong_namespace ⚠️
ask_holmes 38_rabbitmq_split_head
ask_holmes 39_failed_toolset
ask_holmes 40_disabled_toolset
ask_holmes 41_setup_argo
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_result_all_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_result_new_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_result_old_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 42_dns_issues_steps_old_tools ⚠️
ask_holmes 43_current_datetime_from_prompt
ask_holmes 43_slack_deployment_logs
ask_holmes 44_slack_statefulset_logs
ask_holmes 45_fetch_deployment_logs_simple
ask_holmes 46_job_crashing_no_longer_exists ⚠️
ask_holmes 47_truncated_logs_context_window ⚠️
ask_holmes 48_logs_since_thursday ⚠️
ask_holmes 49_logs_since_last_week ⚠️
ask_holmes 50_logs_since_specific_date ⚠️
ask_holmes 51_logs_summarize_errors
ask_holmes 52_logs_login_issues ⚠️
ask_holmes 53_logs_find_term
ask_holmes 54_not_truncated_when_getting_pods
investigate 01_oom_kill
investigate 02_crashloop_backoff
investigate 03_cpu_throttling
investigate 04_image_pull_backoff
investigate 05_crashpod
investigate 06_job_failure
investigate 07_job_syntax_error
investigate 08_memory_pressure
investigate 09_high_latency
investigate 10_KubeDeploymentReplicasMismatch
investigate 11_KubePodCrashLooping
investigate 12_KubePodNotReady
investigate 13_Watchdog
investigate 14_tempo
investigate 15_dns_resolution ⚠️

Legend

  • ✅ the test was successful
  • ⚠️ the test failed but is known to be flakky or known to fail
  • ❌ the test failed and should be fixed before merging the PR

@Sheeproid Sheeproid merged commit d8524a8 into master Jul 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@Sheeproid Sheeproid deleted the tag-failing-test branch July 7, 2025 06:37
This was referenced Jul 24, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants