Skip to content

Conversation

@tormodvolden
Copy link
Contributor

This is the alternative mentioned in #33. I don't think it has any advantage as-is, but it is maybe a longer step in the right direction towards proper async support (which requires a solution for the lifetime of the out buffer).

The same explanation and disclaimer in #33 applies here.

Signed-off-by: Tormod Volden <debian.tormod@gmail.com>
@mcuee mcuee added the libusb0.sys specific to libusb0.sys backend of libusbk.dll label Oct 30, 2021
@mcuee
Copy link
Owner

mcuee commented Oct 30, 2021

@TravisRo Please take a look at this when you got the time. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

libusb0.sys specific to libusb0.sys backend of libusbk.dll

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants