Skip to content

Use distinct output filenames for bcfools and svdb#716

Merged
ramprasadn merged 4 commits into
nf-core:devfrom
alexiandra97:fix_svdb_merge
Oct 9, 2025
Merged

Use distinct output filenames for bcfools and svdb#716
ramprasadn merged 4 commits into
nf-core:devfrom
alexiandra97:fix_svdb_merge

Conversation

@alexiandra97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When running the pipeline, the same filename was used for both the input and output. It's related to #686

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/raredisease branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core pipelines lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test_singleton,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@nf-core-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Warning

Newer version of the nf-core template is available.

Your pipeline is using an old version of the nf-core template: 3.3.1.
Please update your pipeline to the latest version.

For more documentation on how to update your pipeline, please see the nf-core documentation and Synchronisation documentation.

@jemten jemten left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@ramprasadn ramprasadn merged commit 23982d0 into nf-core:dev Oct 9, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants