Improve validation of run_accessions IDs within sample IDs#484
Conversation
|
|
@nf-core-bot fix linting |
sofstam
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested and it detects if a run_accession and a sample Id are not unique.
|
I'm just wondering, are there good cases for when a run accession should not be globally unique, but only within a sample? |
Do you approve then @sofstam ? |
Depends on naming schemes basically... My definition of a run was based on ENA run accessions where they were were unique. But @sofstam had an issue where they were not unique, as they were interpreted as a sequencing run accession (so in the table, the same sequencing run was shared across all the samples). |
|
I approve, shall but shall we merge the template first? |
sofstam
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The linting should be fixed before merging!
Should hopefully close #483
PR checklist
nf-core lint).nf-test test main.nf.test -profile test,docker).nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).docs/usage.mdis updated.docs/output.mdis updated.CHANGELOG.mdis updated.README.mdis updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).