You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Version 2.000;GOOG;noto-source:20170915:90ef993387c0
Issue
The roman glyph for U+AB60 LATIN SMALL LETTER SAKHA YAT should look like a upright version of an italic U+0463 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YAT; it should not look like a rearranged U+044B CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YERU, as it does in these fonts. See the Unicode proposal (L2/12-044) for examples.
The italic glyphs for U+0463 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YAT and U+AB60 LATIN SMALL LETTER SAKHA YAT are wrong. They should look something like an italic Cyrillic pe with a bowl on the right leg, as opposed to Noto’s glyphs, which are just slanted versions of the upright glyphs. See figure 1 of the Unicode proposal for an italic example.
Character data
ѣꭠ
U+0463 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YAT
U+AB60 LATIN SMALL LETTER SAKHA YAT
The glyph for U+AB60 looks correct now
The italic glyphs for U+0463 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YAT and U+AB60 LATIN SMALL LETTER SAKHA YAT looks good
The italic U+2DFA COMBINING CYRILLIC LETTER YAT looks good in NotoSerif but still wrong in NotoSans
Activity
dscorbett commentedon May 5, 2018
The same goes for the italic U+2DFA COMBINING CYRILLIC LETTER YAT.


nizarsq commentedon Jul 14, 2020
The glyph for U+AB60 looks correct now

The italic glyphs for U+0463 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YAT and U+AB60 LATIN SMALL LETTER SAKHA YAT looks good
The italic U+2DFA COMBINING CYRILLIC LETTER YAT looks good in NotoSerif but still wrong in NotoSans