Hey @lwr20

Thanks for your PR and apologies for the late reply. It looks good to me and I am happy to merge it. Would you be able to resolve the conflict in the .gitignore?

Also, could you add a paragraph to the docs explaining JustAfterEach? You can follow the style of JustBeforeEach (see here).

That's great news, thanks! I'll find some time to do those things next week.

Dumb question time now - where would I find the docs to add that paragraph?

To add the docs you should open a PR to the gh-pages branch:

git checkout gh-pages
<make changes>

# If you want to check the docs locally
bundle install 
bundle exec jekyll serve
# ... open the browser and check your changes ...

Feel free to ping me if you have doubts and thanks for your help 👍

@lwr20 @nodo Did we ever get docs for this? I'd like to merge.

You haven't received docs for this yet and that's my fault. I'll try to knock something up today.

Docs update in #533

I had a play around with this just now, the behaviour is intuitive if you know JustBeforeEach, but here's the sample I used anyway:

var _ = Describe("Testing Just After Eaches", func() {

	BeforeEach(func() {
		fmt.Println("BeforeEach")
	})

	JustBeforeEach(func() {
		fmt.Println("JustBeforeEach")
	})

	When("in a context", func() {

		BeforeEach(func() {
			fmt.Println("NestedBeforeEach")
		})

		JustBeforeEach(func() {
			fmt.Println("NestedJustBeforeEach")
		})

		It("does more stuff", func() {
			fmt.Println("It")
		})

		JustAfterEach(func() {
			fmt.Println("NestedJustAfterEach")
		})

		AfterEach(func() {
			fmt.Println("NestedAfterEach")
		})

	})

	JustAfterEach(func() {
		fmt.Println("JustAfterEach")
	})

	AfterEach(func() {
		fmt.Println("AfterEach")
	})
})

Thanks for your contribution!