Adding functionality to restrict report to base #872
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced May 16, 2021
beckyjackson
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2021
Contributor
beckyjackson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tested this out on a couple of ontologies and it works as expected.
jamesaoverton
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2021
Member
jamesaoverton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@beckyjackson Please update the CHANGELOG and merge this.
Member
|
@beckyjackson Thanks. Please merge this into |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #830
docs/have been added/updatedmvn verifysays all tests passmvn sitesays all JavaDocs correctCHANGELOG.mdhas been updatedThis is my attempt to do as little damage as possible, while introducing the ability to restrict the report to specified entities. I have run a few tests locally, and it works as expected, but best have a good look.