The current draft doesn't use the normal [@!RFC9901] to track normative/informative references, and the normative references section is currently empty.
I think not using the normal mechanism might've been deliberate as it might not be compatible with keeping the doc in ISO format but I don't think we ever discussed that or looked at options.
The current draft doesn't use the normal
[@!RFC9901]to track normative/informative references, and the normative references section is currently empty.I think not using the normal mechanism might've been deliberate as it might not be compatible with keeping the doc in ISO format but I don't think we ever discussed that or looked at options.