Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@sakulstra
Copy link
Contributor

@sakulstra sakulstra commented Mar 8, 2021

supersedes the liquidity part of #114, @alexandre-abrioux please have a look if this makes sense to you.

@kyzia551, please have a look as well - should we flag this breaking / should i add reexports to v1. to make this non breaking?
If yes i should probably also drop that commit 803808aa5baf69dab97367ef7795d998b0f7c15c as i flattened the properties to be less based on thegraph types/ easier to use without thegraph.

@alexandre-abrioux
Copy link
Contributor

@sakulstra I just checked out your branch and the test I introduced in #114 is green :) Looks good to me! Thanks

@sakulstra sakulstra requested a review from kyzia551 March 8, 2021 23:32
@kyzia551 kyzia551 merged commit ecce2b0 into master Mar 10, 2021
@kyzia551 kyzia551 deleted the fix/linear-liquidity-increase branch March 10, 2021 13:18
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants