Skip to content

Conversation

@skarya22
Copy link
Contributor

Brief summary of changes

  • Show the examiner name in the conflict resolver as well as the ID, as just the ID makes it difficult for users.
  • This was previously done as well but the change was likely lost in the shuffle

Testing instructions (if applicable)

  1. create a data entry conflict for the Examiner field if your DB does not have any already
  2. see that the conflict has the examiner names and not just the ID
  3. resolve Examiner conflict & make sure examiner name is there as well
  4. check respective instrument table that ExaminerID is valid for the resolved conflict
  5. comment "Good job, Saagar! 🍻" and approve PR

CCNA OVERRIDE PR

@kongtiaowang
Copy link
Contributor

截屏2024-10-30 下午2 31 07 截屏2024-10-30 下午2 31 32 Good job, Saagar!!!!!

Copy link
Contributor

@kongtiaowang kongtiaowang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kongtiaowang kongtiaowang added the Passed manual tests PR has been successfully tested by at least one peer label Oct 30, 2024
@driusan driusan merged commit a32d217 into aces:main Oct 30, 2024
ZhichGaming pushed a commit to ZhichGaming/Loris that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
- Show the examiner name in the conflict resolver as well as the ID, as
just the ID makes it difficult for users.
- This was previously done in PR#2891 as well but the change was lost at
   some point.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Passed manual tests PR has been successfully tested by at least one peer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants