Skip to content

Conversation

@tom76kimo
Copy link
Contributor

Based on #358, though I think it's a rare case, we can still add defensive code here to prevent possible bug.
How do you think? @src-code @redonkulus

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 99.749% when pulling 67194b0 on tom76kimo:fix into 0dc7aac on acss-io:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 99.749% when pulling 67194b0 on tom76kimo:fix into 0dc7aac on acss-io:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 1f9c9fd on tom76kimo:fix into 0dc7aac on acss-io:master.

@tom76kimo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@redonkulus @src-code

@src-code src-code merged commit 9937fad into acss-io:master Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants