Add zip64 support for ZipArchive extraction #205
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
Looks good to me, thanks! Does CLS compliance matter a lot? I guess if there is a demand for 9+ exabyte files then that can be another fix :) |
Owner
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've taken a first cut at some limited zip64 support. It is extract only and only on the Archive API at this point.
Note: I'm casting 8 byte values to
longinstead of supporting the fullulongas it simplifies the implementation quite a bit. Things likeReader.Seektake alongdirectly, it's easy enough to cover that with multiple reads but I ended up backing away as it made the change much larger for minimal benefit (9 Exabyte archive size limitation instead of 18 etc). Also CLS compliance means we can't exposeulong. More than happy to revisit that if required.