Tags: bitwarden/sdk-sm
Tags
chore: update sdk internal to 3.0.0 (#1515) ## 🎟️ Tracking <!-- Paste the link to the Jira or GitHub issue or otherwise describe / point to where this change is coming from. --> ## 📔 Objective Update to sdk-internal 3.0.0 in preparation for sdk-sm release.
chore: update sdk internal to 3.0.0 (#1515) ## 🎟️ Tracking <!-- Paste the link to the Jira or GitHub issue or otherwise describe / point to where this change is coming from. --> ## 📔 Objective Update to sdk-internal 3.0.0 in preparation for sdk-sm release.
chore: update sdk internal to 3.0.0 (#1515) ## 🎟️ Tracking <!-- Paste the link to the Jira or GitHub issue or otherwise describe / point to where this change is coming from. --> ## 📔 Objective Update to sdk-internal 3.0.0 in preparation for sdk-sm release.
Bump bitwarden version to 2.0.0 (#1429) ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] New feature development - [ ] Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc) - [ ] Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps) - [X] Other ## Objective Automated bitwarden version bump to 2.0.0
Bump dotnet-sdk version to 1.0.0 (#1208) ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] New feature development - [ ] Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc) - [ ] Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps) - [X] Other ## Objective Automated dotnet-sdk version bump to 1.0.0
[PM-12431] Temporarily un-export bitwarden_fido (#1072) ## 🎟️ Tracking https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-12431 ## 📔 Objective Temporarily un-export `bitwarden-fido`. We can't release crates for `1.0` because: - `bitwarden-fido` currently relies on dependencies that are GitHub repositories ([reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/specifying-dependencies.html#specifying-dependencies-from-other-registries)) - `bitwarden-fido` is not yet released (same with the aforementioned dependencies) This PR also includes the auto-updates to the `Cargo.lock file`, which should be fine. ⭐️**NOTE**⭐️: This will break CI, this should only be merged when we are ready to do 1.0 releases of `bitwarden`, `bws`, etc. It should quickly be followed up a PR, after release, which reverses this. ## ⏰ Reminders before review - Contributor guidelines followed - All formatters and local linters executed and passed - Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable - Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags) - Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings - CI builds passed - Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements - Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team ## 🦮 Reviewer guidelines <!-- Suggested interactions but feel free to use (or not) as you desire! --> - 👍 (`:+1:`) or similar for great changes - 📝 (`:memo:`) or ℹ️ (`:information_source:`) for notes or general info - ❓ (`:question:`) for questions - 🤔 (`:thinking:`) or 💭 (`:thought_balloon:`) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion - 🎨 (`:art:`) for suggestions / improvements - ❌ (`:x:`) or⚠️ (`:warning:`) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention - 🌱 (`:seedling:`) or ♻️ (`:recycle:`) for future improvements or indications of technical debt - ⛏ (`:pick:`) for minor or nitpick changes
PreviousNext