Skip to content

index/store/moss KV backend propagates mossStore's Stats()#420

Merged
mschoch merged 1 commit into
blevesearch:masterfrom
steveyen:MB-20590
Sep 12, 2016
Merged

index/store/moss KV backend propagates mossStore's Stats()#420
mschoch merged 1 commit into
blevesearch:masterfrom
steveyen:MB-20590

Conversation

@steveyen

@steveyen steveyen commented Sep 8, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change depends on the recently introduced mossStore Stats() API
in github.com/couchbase/moss 564bdbc0 commit.

Most of the change involves propagating the mossStore instance (the
statsFunc callback) so that it's accessible to the KVStore.Stats()
method.

See also: http://review.couchbase.org/#/c/67524/

This change depends on the recently introduced mossStore Stats() API
in github.com/couchbase/moss 564bdbc0 commit.  So, gvt for moss has
been updated as part of this change.

Most of the change involves propagating the mossStore instance (the
statsFunc callback) so that it's accessible to the KVStore.Stats()
method.

See also: http://review.couchbase.org/#/c/67524/
@steveyen

steveyen commented Sep 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hi @mschoch - of note, there's a gvt update moss that's a part of this pull request

@mschoch

mschoch commented Sep 12, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry I missed this somehow. I see the gvt update also seems to have added a new line "vcs" to each entry. Do you happen to know if this is backwards compatible? It's not a big deal, just curious.

@mschoch

mschoch commented Sep 12, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Answering my own question, it appears that the 'gvt restore' command we use in the travis CI worked on this PR branch, so no reason to think it isn't backwards compatible.

@mschoch mschoch merged commit f531835 into blevesearch:master Sep 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants