-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 742
fix(consensus/reactor): reject oversized proposals (backport #5324) #5407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
--- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here #5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. #### PR checklist - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments --------- Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ff47d0)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is being reviewed by Cursor Bugbot
Details
Your team is on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle for each member of your team.
To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial.
aljo242
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2025
tqin7
pushed a commit
to dydxprotocol/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2025
…#5324) (cometbft#5407) --- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here cometbft#5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. #### PR checklist - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com>
tqin7
pushed a commit
to dydxprotocol/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2025
…#5324) (cometbft#5407) --- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here cometbft#5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com>
tqin7
pushed a commit
to dydxprotocol/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2025
…#5324) (cometbft#5407) --- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here cometbft#5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com>
tqin7
added a commit
to dydxprotocol/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2025
* fix(bits): prevent BitArray.UnmarshalJSON from crashing on 0 bits in the JSON (backport cometbft#2774) (cometbft#2778) This change fixes a bug in which BitArray.UnmarshalJSON hadn't accounted for the fact that invoking NewBitArray(<=0) returns nil and hence when dereferenced would crash with a runtime nil pointer dereference. This bug was found by my security analysis and fuzzing too. Author: @odeke-em Fixes cometbft#2658 --- - [x] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] ~~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2774 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> * fix(consensus/reactor): reject oversized proposals (backport cometbft#5324) (cometbft#5407) --- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here cometbft#5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com> * Merge commit from fork * add VaidateBasic to BitArray to ensure Bits and len(Elems) are valid * call ValidateBasic on BitArrays when receiving as a msg from exteranl nodes * enfore SetIndex is not setting out of bounds * add guard to getNumTrueIndices getNumTrueIndices will index out of bounds if Bits and Elems have a mismatch where len(elems) != (bits+63)/64, this guard makes it simply return 0 if this mismatch is present * changelog * fix missing import for v0.38.x * update changelog for release of v0.38.19 * remove duplicate bug fixes from unreleased * fix changelog date * fix lint * fix expected error string in test * add necessary test constants --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@cosmoslabs.io>
beer-1
pushed a commit
to initia-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2025
…#5324) (cometbft#5407) --- Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes`. Original PR is here cometbft#5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying. #### PR checklist - [ ] Tests written/updated - [ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Alex | Interchain Labs <alex@cosmoslabs.io> Co-authored-by: arsushi <richie@asymmetric.re> Co-authored-by: Abdul Malek <me@almk.dev> Co-authored-by: Matt Acciai <matt@skip.money> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tyler <48813565+technicallyty@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: maradini77 <140460067+maradini77@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates the consensus reactor to validate that a received proposal will not contain more parts than the amount of chunks that it would take to build a block whos size is equal to
ConsensusParams.Block.MaxBytes.Original PR is here #5309, but reopened since the contributor stopped replying.
PR checklist
.changelog(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/orspec/) and code commentsThis is an automatic backport of pull request #5324 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).