Skip to content

Numeric series in/notIn opertors are too strict #646

Open

Description

@stariy95

Current implementation of in/notIn operators in numeric series (like IntBaseSeries, LongBaseSeries, etc.) are too strict, as they only allow the values of same type as a series.

This could lead to confusion in QL where long(a) in (1, 2, 3) will always return false.

The fix should be just an auto-conversion of arguments, I think it's better to do this in the operators, rather than in QL.

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Oct 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions