Skip to content

Execution Layer Meeting 193 #1104

Description

@timbeiko

Meeting Info

Agenda

Activity

  1. michaelsproul commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @michaelsproul

    I would like to seek agreement to merge engine_getBlobsV1. My prototype in Reth+Lighthouse is working well, and the spec had some input from CL+EL devs on Discord. Unfortunately I won't be able to make the call due to the timezone, but will try to nominate someone to champion it on my behalf (DM me if interested)

  2. yperbasis commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @yperbasis
    Member

    Time permitting, I'd like to discuss Verkle quantum resistance. As @vbuterin highlighted at EthCC, many experts forecast that in 2030s quantum computers will be powerful enough to break non-trivial cryptography. Given that the cryptography in Verkle is not quantum-resistant, a couple of questions arise:

    1. How feasible/practical is this theoretical vulnerability and what would be concrete consequences of a successful attack?
    2. Is it possible to have something similar to Vekle, but quantum-resistant? Shouldn't we upgrade to that directly, given that the danger might become imminent only in a few years?
  3. weiihann commented on Jul 31, 2024

    @weiihann

    I'd like to introduce and discuss EIP-7736 (Leaf-level State Expiry).

    The progress on state expiry has been stagnant in recent years. Previous proposals have been stalled by increasing complexity and require heavy changes on Ethereum's structure (e.g. address space extension). The proposal offers a simpler approach to state expiry in a post-Verkle environment, where only the leaf nodes are removed and leaving the rest of the nodes intact.

  4. timbeiko commented on Jul 31, 2024

    @timbeiko
    ContributorAuthor

    @michaelsproul added to the agenda! @yperbasis @weiihann I've added both your topics for the later half of the call. I expect we'll have time to go over them, but small chance they'll get bumped two weeks if the Pectra agenda items take up most/all of the call.

  5. fjl commented on Aug 1, 2024

    @fjl

    Bit of a last-minute addition to the agenda, but we would like to discuss the encoding of EIP-6110 requests objects in the engine API. Some people in Geth feel the encoding should be changed to SSZ.

  6. timbeiko commented on Aug 1, 2024

    @timbeiko
    ContributorAuthor

    @fjl I'll add it to the Pectra section, thanks!

  7. timbeiko commented on Aug 1, 2024

    @timbeiko
    ContributorAuthor

    Closed in favor of #1124

  8. abcoathup commented on Aug 2, 2024

    @abcoathup
  9. poojaranjan commented on Aug 2, 2024

    @poojaranjan
    Contributor
  10. added a commit that references this issue on Aug 11, 2024
  11. added
    ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus
    ExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer
    on Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions