Repository navigation
All Core Devs Meeting #14 #12
Description
Activity
Regarding 2, maybe expand to focus on (i) how much every client has implemented, and (ii) how much there are tests for?
- About EIP86 a.k.a eip-208, there is a difference between the EIP pull-request and the implementations. Which should be fixed?
The point is whether to change the addressing scheme of CREATE instruction, in addition to the create transactions.
- EIP86 PR does not change the addressing scheme of CREATE instruction (only the addressing scheme of create transactions change).
- cpp-ethereum is going to change the addressing scheme of CREATE instruction.
- Parity is also going to change CREATE instruction.
- YP PR is also changing CREATE instruction.
2 (iii) some accepted EIPs are not yet specific enough to form a protocol consensus. What is the next action by whom?
- pairing check (Precompiled contract for pairing check. EIPs#212) has gas costs unspecified. It also uses an already-taken address.
- group addition on elliptic curve (Precompiled contracts for addition and scalar multiplication on the elliptic curve alt_bn128 EIPs#213) has gas costs unspecified. It also used an already-taken address.
- Blockhash and state root changes EIPs#96 has [getter_code] unspecified.
- removing medstate from receipts - go & cpp implemented option 2, Parity seems to have went with option 1
Notes and video added. Closing issues.
https://github.com/ethereum/pm/blob/master/All%20Core%20Devs%20Meetings/Meeting%2014.md
- added a commit that references this issue
on Jun 4, 2025
All Core Devs Meeting 14 Agenda
Meeting Date/Time: Friday 4/21/17 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration 1.5 hours
Agenda
Carbonvote link.
Reddit thread #1.
Reddit thread #2.
Please provide comments to add or correct agenda topics.