Repository navigation
Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 80 Agenda #150
Description
Activity
Hello,
After speaking with @timbeiko, I am happy to attend this call to discuss and answer questions regarding Ethereum JSON-RPC Specification, JSON-RPC and OpenRPC. All constructive feedback is greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Reacted by Tim BeikoHi,
I'd like to discuss the inclusion of EIP-1930 that would help fix serious issues in smart contract that require call to get a specific amount of gas.
Thanks
Reacted by Tim BeikoI'd like to discuss blessing EIP 2315: Simple Subroutines for the EVM
Reacted by Tim Beiko and El De-dog-loReacted by El De-dog-loReacted by El De-dog-loReacted by El De-dog-loHere was a call for progress for EIPs, so for 1962:
- Rust and C++ implementations are complete
- ABI was updated
- I want to make another run on the gas metering. Old results are still fine, but larger statistics is always good
- I'd really want to have some EIP with reduced cost of precompiles to pass cause now it's ~200 gas for point addition for BN254 curve that is much cheaper than call costs. Multiplication is around 3k, so 700 is not negligible compared to it too
- Go implementation with assembly is also complete and tested, but lacks gas metering functions and is only x86_64 for now
If someone can make an integration into Parity and Geth then it should be complete in two weeks.
Reacted by kilic and saitimaSubroutines is listed twice. The first time it has the wrong number: EIP-2135 (which is not a core EIP)
Reacted by Tim Beiko and Tomohide MurataI’d like to bring up a PR I made to EIP 1.
It consolidates the Fork Process EIP and the EFI list. It also adds a Table of a contents ethereum/EIPs#2508
Reacted by Tim BeikoI'd like to discuss EIP-1962, to verify it allows for BLS verification and to discuss its timeline relative to eth2.
Reacted by tvanepps and Alex StokesAnything particular about BLS signatures?
Lets also add EIP 2046 to the list.
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2046I mostly want to get the status of the development as I have seen more demand for this then other EIPs we have talked about. It came up two or three times throughout the week.
Closed in favor of #152
- addedACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layerLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer
on Feb 4, 2025
Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 80 Agenda
Agenda