Activity

1. shamatar commented on Oct 27, 2020

   

   shamatar

   on Oct 27, 2020

   Last edited by shamatar

   More actions

   With Berlin being still far away I'd like to propose EIP-2666 back on track at least for discussion. Clients did report their performance numbers, so

   • formulas proposed reflect the current state of affairs and do no impose DDoS vectors
   • there are no changes in the code other than price constants
2. claberus commented on Oct 29, 2020

   

   claberus

   on Oct 29, 2020

   More actions

   We currently have a pending decision to audit the code from BLS12-381 operations on Rust for OpenEthereum. It would cost +$50K so we are concerned about the possibility of EVM384 being included in Berlin HF and making the audit unnecessary.

   It would be very helpful for us to know your expectations of EVM384 for Berlin HF.
3. SamWilsn commented on Oct 29, 2020

   

   SamWilsn

   on Oct 29, 2020

   More actions

   We'd like to continue the discussion around EIP-2938 if there's time on the call.
4. poojaranjan commented on Oct 30, 2020

   

   poojaranjan

   on Oct 30, 2020

   Contributor

   More actions

   EIP-2935: Save historical block hashes in state episode on Peep in EIP is available at https://youtu.be/QH5yuNd3B6o as mentioned in the call by Tomasz.
5. timbeiko commented on Oct 30, 2020

   

   timbeiko

   on Oct 30, 2020

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Closed in favor of #221
6. timbeiko

   closed this as completedon Oct 30, 2020
7. timbeiko

   added

   agenda

   on Mar 29, 2021
8. nixorokish

   added

   ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus

   ExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layerLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer

   on Feb 4, 2025