Skip to content

update submodule#337

Merged
xiexiaoy merged 1 commit into
eloqdata:mainfrom
lzxddz:rm-eloqstore-shard
Nov 27, 2025
Merged

update submodule#337
xiexiaoy merged 1 commit into
eloqdata:mainfrom
lzxddz:rm-eloqstore-shard

Conversation

@lzxddz

@lzxddz lzxddz commented Nov 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal dependency versions with no functional changes or end-user impact.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@lzxddz lzxddz self-assigned this Nov 27, 2025
@lzxddz lzxddz requested a review from xiexiaoy November 27, 2025 06:13
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The submodule pointer for src/mongo/db/modules/eloq/store_handler is updated from commit 50a13201e6ca86fa9ee42d9a72fd28696f891864 to db471e81e8302d795c997ed441cf14de6730543f. No functional code changes are introduced in this repository.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Submodule pointer update
src/mongo/db/modules/eloq/store_handler
Updated submodule commit reference from 50a13201e6ca86fa9ee42d9a72fd28696f891864 to db471e81e8302d795c997ed441cf14de6730543f

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

trigger-ci

Suggested reviewers

  • liunyl
  • thweetkomputer

Poem

🐰 A pointer hops along the way,
From one commit to new display,
No code to fuss, just refs to shift,
Store handler gets a gentle lift! 📦

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'update submodule' is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term that doesn't convey which submodule was updated or why. Use a more specific title like 'Update store_handler submodule to db471e81' or 'Update eloq/store_handler submodule' to clarify which submodule was updated and its purpose.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1999e51 and 82c3ab2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/mongo/db/modules/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/mongo/db/modules/eloq/store_handler (1)

1-1: Verify submodule commit validity and confirm no breaking changes.

The submodule pointer is being updated from 50a13201e6ca86fa9ee42d9a72fd28696f891864 to db471e81e8302d795c997ed441cf14de6730543f. Given the PR branch name rm-eloqstore-shard, this update likely incorporates significant changes. Before merging, ensure:

  1. The new commit hash exists and is valid in the submodule repository.
  2. There are no breaking changes or API disruptions to consumers of this submodule.
  3. Any necessary migration steps or coordination with other services are documented.

If there are breaking changes or migration requirements, consider adding migration notes or a changelog entry to help downstream teams understand the impact.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@xiexiaoy xiexiaoy merged commit fd17707 into eloqdata:main Nov 27, 2025
2 checks passed
@lzxddz lzxddz deleted the rm-eloqstore-shard branch November 27, 2025 06:14
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants