Skip to content

Update wavelengthIndex description for processed data#175

Open
sreekanthkura7 wants to merge 2 commits into
fNIRS:masterfrom
sreekanthkura7:master
Open

Update wavelengthIndex description for processed data#175
sreekanthkura7 wants to merge 2 commits into
fNIRS:masterfrom
sreekanthkura7:master

Conversation

@sreekanthkura7

@sreekanthkura7 sreekanthkura7 commented Jan 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Clarified requirements for wavelengthIndex in processed data.

Closes #174

Clarified requirements for wavelengthIndex in processed data.

@HanBnrd HanBnrd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sreekanthkura7, good catch! Looks good to me!

@Horschig

Horschig commented Jan 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I guess this change would require a respective adjustment in the validator, right? Is @sstucker still the designated validator maintainer?

@jcrdubois

Copy link
Copy Markdown

is this the final convention that has been decided on? Some readers have made their own convention, e.g. Cedalion uses -1 https://github.com/ibs-lab/cedalion/blob/main/src/cedalion/io/snirf.py#L1003

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Suggestion] How Should wavelengthIndex Be Defined for Multi-Wavelength Processed Data?

6 participants