Skip to content

Conversation

@lisaknbur
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

How did you test this change?

  • Test(s) added
  • Manual testing (please provide screenshots/recordings)
  • No testing (please provide an explanation)

@lisaknbur lisaknbur requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2025 23:09
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3e8dbf9

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 24 packages
Name Type
@finos/legend-application-studio Patch
@finos/legend-application-studio-bootstrap Patch
@finos/legend-extension-application-studio-depot-dashboard Patch
@finos/legend-extension-assortment Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-data-quality Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-data-space-studio Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-diagram-studio Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-persistence Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-service Patch
@finos/legend-extension-dsl-text Patch
@finos/legend-extension-store-flat-data Patch
@finos/legend-extension-store-relational Patch
@finos/legend-extension-store-service-store Patch
@finos/legend-vscode-extension-dependencies Patch
@finos/legend-application-studio-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-application-query-bootstrap Patch
@finos/legend-application-query-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-application-data-cube-bootstrap Patch
@finos/legend-application-marketplace-bootstrap Patch
@finos/legend-application-data-cube-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-application-marketplace-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-application-pure-ide-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-application-repl-deployment Patch
@finos/legend-server-showcase-deployment Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 377 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 2.48%. Comparing base (dc29dae) to head (3e8dbf9).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ation-studio/src/stores/editor/EditorGraphState.ts 0.00% 212 Missing ⚠️
...ation-editor-state/ProjectDependencyEditorState.ts 0.00% 102 Missing ⚠️
...t-configuration-editor/ProjectDependencyEditor.tsx 0.00% 57 Missing ⚠️
...on-editor-state/ProjectConfigurationEditorState.ts 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (dc29dae) and HEAD (3e8dbf9). Click for more details.

HEAD has 4 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (dc29dae) HEAD (3e8dbf9)
6 2
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4688       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   47.26%    2.48%   -44.78%     
===========================================
  Files        2547     2545        -2     
  Lines      465051   465385      +334     
  Branches    19744     3525    -16219     
===========================================
- Hits       219791    11551   -208240     
- Misses     244782   451939   +207157     
- Partials      478     1895     +1417     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...on-editor-state/ProjectConfigurationEditorState.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (-55.23%) ⬇️
...t-configuration-editor/ProjectDependencyEditor.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-69.86%) ⬇️
...ation-editor-state/ProjectDependencyEditorState.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (-87.97%) ⬇️
...ation-studio/src/stores/editor/EditorGraphState.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (-65.51%) ⬇️

... and 1725 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

.currentProjectConfiguration;
try {
if (currentConfiguration.projectDependencies.length) {
this.editorStore.projectConfigurationEditorState.syncExclusionsToProjectDependencies();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this shouldnt be needed if the mobox is done correctly. why do we need to sync. the observables should handle the updates.

ProjectVersionEntities.serialization.fromJson(e),
);

const exclusionsByParent = new Map<string, Set<string>>();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we removing this logic ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants