Skip to content

chore: execute goimports to format the code #6801

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
machichima merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2025
Merged

chore: execute goimports to format the code #6801

machichima merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2025
+1 −1

Conversation

@findfluctuate
Copy link
Contributor

@findfluctuate findfluctuate commented Dec 12, 2025 •
edited by flyte-bot
Loading

Tracking issue

Why are the changes needed?

execute goimports to format the code

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

How was this patch tested?

Labels

Please add one or more of the following labels to categorize your PR:

  • added: For new features.
  • changed: For changes in existing functionality.
  • deprecated: For soon-to-be-removed features.
  • removed: For features being removed.
  • fixed: For any bug fixed.
  • security: In case of vulnerabilities

This is important to improve the readability of release notes.

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

  • I updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

Summary by Bito

  • This pull request updates the import statement for the mockery package in the specified file, ensuring adherence to formatting standards.
  • The primary change involves executing goimports to format the code, which enhances code readability and maintainability.
  • Overall, this pull request focuses on code formatting changes, specifically updating imports, and does not introduce any risks.

@findfluctuate
chore: execute goimports to format the code
5793ebd 
Signed-off-by: findfluctuate <findfluctuate@outlook.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.94%. Comparing base (be517bd) to head (9768269).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6801   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.93%   56.94%           
=======================================
  Files         929      929           
  Lines       58139    58139           
=======================================
+ Hits        33102    33106    +4     
+ Misses      21996    21992    -4     
  Partials     3041     3041
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog 53.51% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin 53.14% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests-flytecopilot 43.06% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl 64.02% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
unittests-flyteidl 75.71% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins 60.13% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller 53.54% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib 63.29% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

machichima
machichima approved these changes Dec 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@machichima machichima left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@machichima machichima enabled auto-merge (squash) December 19, 2025 07:03
@machichima machichima merged commit 002321e into flyteorg:master Dec 19, 2025
48 of 49 checks passed
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉

@flyte-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

flyte-bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Bito Automatic Review Skipped – PR Already Merged

Bito scheduled an automatic review for this pull request, but the review was skipped because this PR was merged before the review could be run.
No action is needed if you didn't intend to review it. To get a review, you can type /review in a comment and save it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@machichima machichima machichima approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@findfluctuate @flyte-bot @machichima