Not a maintainer, but thankful for this work.
Would it be possible to have enum as untion type option as well?

I haven't used Typescript unions much, but it doesn't seem like that would be too bad

Thank you for this PR, it's really great :)

One comment on the generated code in the union case, I would propose to keep the constants around (so that Typescript code can reference it).

Basic enum generation with enum_style: "union"

enum_style: "union"

type UserRole = string
const (
    UserRoleDefault UserRole = "viewer"
    UserRoleEditor  UserRole = "editor"
)

export type UserRole = typeof UserRoleDefault | typeof UserRoleEditor;

export const UserRoleDefault: UserRole = "viewer"
export const UserRoleEditor: UserRole = "editor"

(Or this can be another variant.. But I would say it has benefits over only having UserRole = "viewer" | "editor", as it doesn't provide a way to access the individual values (and their comments in docstring).

Thank you for this PR, it's really great :)

One comment on the generated code in the union case, I would propose to keep the constants around (so that Typescript code can reference it).

Basic enum generation with enum_style: "union"

enum_style: "union"

type UserRole = string
const (
    UserRoleDefault UserRole = "viewer"
    UserRoleEditor  UserRole = "editor"
)

export type UserRole = typeof UserRoleDefault | typeof UserRoleEditor;

export const UserRoleDefault: UserRole = "viewer"
export const UserRoleEditor: UserRole = "editor"

(Or this can be another variant.. But I would say it has benefits over only having UserRole = "viewer" | "editor", as it doesn't provide a way to access the individual values (and their comments in docstring).

Yeah, that makes sense. I just pushed 10d4c17 to address this change

Would be nice to see a review here.
Thank you PY44N for the PR! ❤️