-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
fix: use correct error message for ref vs actual ref #559
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Everything's passing with the exception of #560 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the original was correct, but maybe we could just revise the warning message?
Like "Input expression expected {ref} but the actual sequence on this position is {expected_ref}"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this PR is just modifying the message - it wasn't throwing an error incorrectly, the description of the error was backwards
korikuzma
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this!
Original message is a little ambiguous -- edited for clarity
eg