Suggestion for an order of IDs/links annotations#58
Conversation
And added the missing `xrefs`. This is based on a chat with @bgruening in winter 2020, and is also what I've been following when annotating example IUC tools. If the order should be changed as suggested, it might be good to also change it in https://docs.galaxyproject.org/en/latest/dev/schema.html.
|
Thanks @matuskalas for bringing this up. This here needs also to be changed: https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/lib/galaxy/tool_util/linters/xml_order.py |
|
👍 for grouping these elements Within the group, I'd have a slight preference for moving |
|
A good idea to put them all together. I agree with Wolfgang's order of placement. |
|
Excellent, thanks for the replies! As I understood, the currently winning order would be (Another consideration would be having it all up between I can fix it all over & PR, probably tonight... |
Yes, this is what I have in mind. |
|
@matuskalas As suggested by @bgruening I can add in the documentation some information about EDAM popovers. Does it make sense? If yes, what would be best: make a PR to matuskalas:patch-1 to get it in this PR or to make a separate PR. |
|
Whichever you prefer @annefou :-) |
... and added the missing
xrefs.This is based on a chat with @bgruening in winter 2020, and is also what I've been following when annotating example IUC tools. The idea was to have all the IDs a.k.a. external links a.k.a. upstream annotation next to each other:
xrefs,edam_topics,edam_operations,citations.If the order should be changed as suggested, it might be good to also change it in:
(I volunteer if green light)