Skip to content

Change pprof labels to be prometheus compatible#32865

Merged
wxiaoguang merged 5 commits into
go-gitea:mainfrom
TheFox0x7:change-pprof-label
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Change pprof labels to be prometheus compatible#32865
wxiaoguang merged 5 commits into
go-gitea:mainfrom
TheFox0x7:change-pprof-label

Conversation

@TheFox0x7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Enables scrapping pprof endpoint for continuous profiling

Closes: #32854


There's probably room for improvement - for example dropping graceful_lifecycle completely and making with-hammer into with: hammer key value (or something similar). But I'd wait with that for a proper spec in OTel so there there won't be a need to align to spec n times.

Name is compliant with both prometheus regex and OTel recommendation (but not to their semantic conventions):

For each multi-word dot-delimited component of the attribute name separate the words by underscores (i.e. use snake_case).

Enables scrapping pprof endpoint for continuous profiling
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Dec 16, 2024
@lunny

lunny commented Dec 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is this a breaking change for those upgraded Gitea instance?

@TheFox0x7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It was marked as such in the fork. However the for it to be breaking someone would actively have to scrape the endpoint for (semi-)automated analysis, which I very much doubt anyone is doing (evidence being that no one complained about it).

If you consider that a real possibility then yes, it is breaking.

@lunny lunny added the pr/breaking Merging this PR means builds will break. Needs a description what exactly breaks, and how to fix it! label Dec 16, 2024
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.24.0 milestone Dec 16, 2024
@lunny

lunny commented Dec 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The pprof labels was introduced in #19202 and I found there is a grafana mixin introduced in #17758. Maybe this can also be added to grafana mixin in the same PR?

Comment thread modules/graceful/manager_common.go Outdated
@wxiaoguang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Maybe this can also be added to grafana mixin in the same PR?

No, there are different, do not mix them at the moment.

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang removed the pr/breaking Merging this PR means builds will break. Needs a description what exactly breaks, and how to fix it! label Dec 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Dec 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Dec 17, 2024
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Dec 17, 2024

@delvh delvh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's measure if it is breaking by whether someone complains 😄

@wxiaoguang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let's measure if it is breaking by whether someone complains 😄

Actually it breaks nothing .....

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang merged commit b945742 into go-gitea:main Dec 18, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Dec 18, 2024
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2025
@TheFox0x7 TheFox0x7 deleted the change-pprof-label branch October 31, 2025 23:13
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Change pprof labels to be conformat with prometheus spec

5 participants