Skip to content

Conversation

@wstcliyu
Copy link
Collaborator

Context: b/440622266

We need to plumb the reservation name so that a Pathways workload can also specify the capacity.

Copy link
Member

@lukebaumann lukebaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Left one comment.

@wstcliyu wstcliyu force-pushed the wstcliyu/capacity-node-selector branch from 2c41749 to 7683ca8 Compare September 30, 2025 23:11
Copy link
Member

@lukebaumann lukebaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@shauryagup shauryagup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI - We also need a PR on XPK to use the new field

@wstcliyu wstcliyu force-pushed the wstcliyu/capacity-node-selector branch 2 times, most recently from a40299f to cc94d43 Compare October 1, 2025 22:39
@wstcliyu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wstcliyu commented Oct 1, 2025

FYI - We also need a PR on XPK to use the new field

Yes and it's already merged.
AI-Hypercomputer/xpk#664

@wstcliyu wstcliyu force-pushed the wstcliyu/capacity-node-selector branch from affb1ee to 057c0ac Compare October 2, 2025 00:02
@wstcliyu wstcliyu requested review from lukebaumann and removed request for RoshaniN, guptaaka and lukebaumann October 2, 2025 00:02
@lukebaumann lukebaumann merged commit ce98fe9 into main Oct 2, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants