-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36k
Correct migration to recorder schema 51 #156267
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hey there @home-assistant/core, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration ( Code owner commandsCode owners of
|
| .where( | ||
| and_( | ||
| StatisticsMeta.unit_of_measurement.in_(conv.VALID_UNITS), | ||
| StatisticsMeta.unit_class.is_(None), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe explain this check with a code comment as above?
|
I'd like an approving review also from @bdraco before merging |
|
Testing matrix
|
Co-authored-by: Martin Hjelmare <marhje52@gmail.com>
Proposed change
Correct migration to recorder schema 51, which adds unit_class to statistics meta data, by making sure we do case sensitive (actually binary) string comparison of the units:
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
ruff format homeassistant tests)If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
Updated and included derived files by running:
python3 -m script.hassfest.requirements_all.txt.Updated by running
python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.To help with the load of incoming pull requests: