@inproceedings{liu-etal-2023-whats,
title = "What{'}s Hard in {E}nglish {RST} Parsing? Predictive Models for Error Analysis",
author = "Liu, Yang Janet and
Aoyama, Tatsuya and
Zeldes, Amir",
editor = "Stoyanchev, Svetlana and
Joty, Shafiq and
Schlangen, David and
Dusek, Ondrej and
Kennington, Casey and
Alikhani, Malihe",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue",
month = sep,
year = "2023",
address = "Prague, Czechia",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigdial-1.3",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.3",
pages = "31--42",
abstract = "Despite recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP), hierarchical discourse parsing in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory remains challenging, and our understanding of the reasons for this are as yet limited. In this paper, we examine and model some of the factors associated with parsing difficulties in previous work: the existence of implicit discourse relations, challenges in identifying long-distance relations, out-of-vocabulary items, and more. In order to assess the relative importance of these variables, we also release two annotated English test-sets with explicit correct and distracting discourse markers associated with gold standard RST relations. Our results show that as in shallow discourse parsing, the explicit/implicit distinction plays a role, but that long-distance dependencies are the main challenge, while lack of lexical overlap is less of a problem, at least for in-domain parsing. Our final model is able to predict where errors will occur with an accuracy of 76.3{\%} for the bottom-up parser and 76.6{\%} for the top-down parser.",
}
NLPErrors4RST/
├── data/
│ ├── GUM9/
│ │ ├── bottomup/
│ │ │ ├── run1/
│ │ │ ├── run2/
│ │ │ ├── run3/
│ │ │ ├── run4/
│ │ │ └── run5/
│ │ ├── human/
│ │ ├── topdown/
│ │ │ ├── run1/
│ │ │ ├── run2/
│ │ │ ├── run3/
│ │ │ ├── run4/
│ │ │ └── run5/
│ │ ├── en-gum-dev-list.txt
│ │ └── GUM_facts.tab
│ └── RSTDT/
│ └── README.md
├── utils/
│ ├── get_dep_info.py
│ ├── get_dep_info_rstdt.py
│ ├── get_distractor_errors.py
│ ├── get_gold_anno.py
│ ├── get_oov_rate.py
│ ├── main_GUM9.py
│ ├── main_RSTDT.py
│ ├── process_facts.py
│ ├── process_preds.py
│ ├── relation2class4rstdt.py
│ ├── sigdial_new_GUM.R
│ ├── sigdial_new_RSTDT.R
│ └── sigdial_pred_GUM.R
└── README.md
datacontains all the gold and predicted parses (.rsd) used in the analysisdata/GUM9/GUM_facts.tabis the processed file that can be directly used by the R scripts inutils/utils/main_GUM9.pyandutils/main_RSTDT.pyare the scripts to generate the*_facts.tabfilesigdial_new_GUM.Randutils/sigdial_new_RSTDT.Rcontains the code used for the analyses described in Section 4.1sigdial_pred_GUM.Rcontains the code used for the modeling in Section 4.2- Other
.pyscripts were used to generate relevant information and are provided here for reference